Lay Morals, and Other PapersStevenson, Robert Louis
Philosophy
Lay Morals, and Other Papers
Stevenson, Robert Louis
Essays; Short stories
But alas! a striking failure may be reached without tempting Providence
by any of these ambitious tricks. Our own stature will be found high
enough for shame. The success of three simple sentences lures us into a
fatal parenthesis in the fourth, from whose shut brackets we may never
disentangle the thread of our discourse. A momentary flush tempts us
into a quotation; and we may be left helpless in the middle of one of
Pope’s couplets, a white film gathering before our eyes, and our kind
friends charitably trying to cover our disgrace by a feeble round of
applause. _Amis lecteurs_, this is a painful topic. It is possible that
we too, we, the ‘potent, grave, and reverend’ editor, may have suffered
these things, and drunk as deep as any of the cup of shameful failure.
Let us dwell no longer on so delicate a subject.
In spite, however, of these disagreeables, I should recommend any student
to suffer them with Spartan courage, as the benefits he receives should
repay him an hundredfold for them all. The life of the debating society
is a handy antidote to the life of the classroom and quadrangle. Nothing
could be conceived more excellent as a weapon against many of those
_peccant humours_ that we have been railing against in the jeremiad of
our last ‘College Paper’—particularly in the field of intellect. It is a
sad sight to see our heather-scented students, our boys of seventeen,
coming up to College with determined views—_roués_ in speculation—having
gauged the vanity of philosophy or learned to shun it as the middle-man
of heresy—a company of determined, deliberate opinionists, not to be
moved by all the sleights of logic. What have such men to do with study?
If their minds are made up irrevocably, why burn the ‘studious lamp’ in
search of further confirmation? Every set opinion I hear a student
deliver I feel a certain lowering of my regard. He who studies, he who
is yet employed in groping for his premises, should keep his mind fluent
and sensitive, keen to mark flaws, and willing to surrender untenable
positions. He should keep himself teachable, or cease the expensive
farce of being taught. It is to further this docile spirit that we
desire to press the claims of debating societies. It is as a means of
melting down this museum of premature petrifactions into living and
impressionable soul that we insist on their utility. If we could once
prevail on our students to feel no shame in avowing an uncertain attitude
towards any subject, if we could teach them that it was unnecessary for
every lad to have his _opinionette_ on every topic, we should have gone a
far way towards bracing the intellectual tone of the coming race of
thinkers; and this it is which debating societies are so well fitted to
perform.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account