Lead poisoning and lead absorption : $b The symptoms, pathology and prevention, with special reference to their industrial origin, and an account of the principal processes involving riskLegge, Thomas Morison, Sir
Science
Lead poisoning and lead absorption : $b The symptoms, pathology and prevention, with special reference to their industrial origin, and an account of the principal processes involving risk
Legge, Thomas Morison, Sir
Lead poisoning
Of many samples of dust collected in workrooms where there are baths
of molten lead, it is impossible to say definitely how much of the
lead present is due to fume, and how much to dust. Thus, a person
tempering the tangs of files was attacked by plumbism, and a sample of
dust collected from an electric pendent directly over the pot, at a
height of 4 feet from the ground, was found to contain 15·6 per cent.
of metallic lead. Similarly, a sample taken above a bath for tempering
railway springs contained 48·1 per cent. metallic lead[1]. And,
again, a sample collected from the top of the magazine of a linotype
machine contained 8·18 per cent. Such analyses point to the necessity
of enclosing, as far as possible, the sources of danger--either the
fume or the dust, or both. Determination of the melting-point of the
molten mass will often help in deciding whether there is risk of fume
from the pot, and, if there is not (as in the sample of dust from the
linotype machine referred to), will direct attention to the sources of
dust in the room. Proceeding on these lines, S. R. Bennett[2], using
a thermo-electric pyrometer which had been previously standardized and
its rate of error ascertained, and checking the results in some cases
by a mercury-in-glass thermometer (the bulb of which was protected by
metal tubing), determined the temperature of the various pots and baths
of molten lead used in the Sheffield district. As was anticipated,
temporary cessation of work, stirring up of metal, recoking of
furnaces, and other causes, produced fluctuations of temperatures from
minute to minute in the same pot, and in its different parts. The
compensated pyrometer used gave for file-hardening pots a maximum of
850° C., and a minimum of 760° C., the average mean working temperature
being about 800° C. The variations of temperature of lead used for
tempering tangs of files and rasps was found to be high, and largely
unrestricted from a practical standpoint. The maximum was 735° C.,
and the minimum 520° C., the average mean working temperature being
650° to 700° C., varying more than this within a few hours in the same
pot. Spring tempering is carried out at some comparatively constant
temperature between a maximum of nearly 600° C. and a minimum of 410°
C., depending on the kind of steel and the purpose for which the steel
is to be employed. Generally, the temperature required rises as the
percentage of carbon in the steel is diminished. As these baths are
larger than file-hardening pots, the temperature range is higher at
the bottom than at the top unless well stirred up. Some lead pots are
set in one side of a flue, and the temperature in the mass is then
greater on the furnace side. From further observation of these pots
during experiments, he was inclined to believe that the lead did not
volatilize directly into the atmosphere, as heated water does, but that
the particles of coke, fused oil, etc., which rise from the surface,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account