Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic HistoryClayton, Joseph
History
Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic History
Clayton, Joseph
Democracy; Great Britain -- History
From the despotism of the Red King Anselm would turn for justice to the
centre of Christendom. In England he was impotent to stem the evil that
flowed from the savage absolutism of the throne. All that one man could
do to resist the royal tyranny Anselm had done, and now this summons to
the King’s Court was the final answer to all his efforts to restrain
a lawless king, and to promote the Christian religion in England. He
would not go through the farce of pleading in the King’s Court, where
judgment was settled by the unbridled caprice of the king, self-respect
forbade the archbishop from that; he would appeal to the only court on
earth higher than the courts of kings--the court whose head, in those
days, was the head of Christendom.[6]
William dropped the summons to the King’s Court, and for a time refused
permission to Anselm to leave the country. Bishops and barons now urged
Anselm not to persist in his appeal to Rome. But the archbishop was
resolute, and in the autumn of 1097 the king yielded, and Anselm left
the country.[7]
The first campaign against despotism in England was over--the battle
was to be renewed when Henry I. wore the crown.
At Rome Pope Urban, with all the goodwill in the world, and with a
very real affection and regard for Anselm, could do nothing against
the Red King except rebuke his envoys, and do honour to the much-tried
archbishop. Anselm himself prevented the excommunication of William
when it was proposed at the Council of Bari, October, 1098.
But Pope Urban would not allow Anselm to resign his archbishopric, and
this in spite of all Anselm’s entreaties.
In the spring of 1099 came a General Council at Rome--at which Anselm
assisted--a council remarkable for its decision against allowing clergy
to receive investiture of churches from the hands of laymen, and by
so doing to become the vassals of temporal lords. Excommunication
was declared to be the penalty for all who gave or received Church
appointments on such conditions.
It was at the close of this council that an outspoken Bishop of Lucca
called attention to Anselm’s case. “One sits amongst us in silence and
meekness who has come from the far ends of the earth. His very silence
cries aloud. His humility and patience, so gentle and so deep, as they
rise to God should set us on fire. This one man has come here, wronged
and afflicted, seeking judgment and justice of the Apostolic See. And
now this is the second year, and what help has he found?”
Pope Urban answered that attention should be given, but nothing further
was done.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account