Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic HistoryClayton, Joseph
History
Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic History
Clayton, Joseph
Democracy; Great Britain -- History
Eliot, a House of Commons man, through and through, saw in the welfare
of parliament the welfare of the nation, and stuck to his point,
carrying the House with him, that the privileges of a member extended
to his goods. To this Charles sent word that what had been done had
been done by his authority. The only question now was, how long would
it be before the king dissolved parliament.
On the second of March, when the House met, the speaker’s first
word was that the king had ordered an adjournment till the tenth,
and that no business could be transacted. Eliot insisted on moving
his resolutions, and the speaker was held down in his chair. Then
the serjeant-at-arms attempted to remove the mace, and was promptly
stopped, while the key of the House was turned from within.
Eliot moved his declaration, beginning with the famous words: “By the
ancient laws and liberties of England, it is the known birthright and
inheritance of the subject, that no tax, tallage, or other charge shall
be levied or imposed but by common consent in England; and that the
subsidies of tonnage and poundage are no way due or payable but by a
free gift and special act of parliament.”
The resolutions were carried with loud shouts of assent, two members
guarding the speaker, and the door was flung open; the sitting was over.
A royal proclamation for dissolving parliament followed on the fourth
of March, and Eliot, with eight other members, was summoned to appear
before the Privy Council.
From the hour of that summons John Eliot’s liberty was over, and not
for eleven years was England to have another parliament.
For the fourth time Eliot was a prisoner. He declined altogether to
give an account of what he had said in parliament, or to acknowledge
any right of interference with the proceedings in parliament. To the
crown lawyers his reply was to stand on the privileges of a member of
the House of Commons. “I refuse to answer,” he said, “because I hold
that it is against the privilege of parliament to speak of anything
which is done in the House.” He insisted that he was accountable to
the House alone, and that no other power existed with a constitutional
right to inquire into his conduct there.
At the end of October Eliot was removed from the Tower to the
Marshalsea, and then in January, 1630, he was charged in the King’s
Bench with two other members, Holles and Valentine, with conspiring to
resist the king’s lawful order, to calumniate ministers of the crown,
and to assault the speaker. Again Eliot refused to acknowledge the
jurisdiction. He was fined £2,000, and sent back to the Tower.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account