Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic HistoryClayton, Joseph
History
Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic History
Clayton, Joseph
Democracy; Great Britain -- History
[120] “Unfortunately his friends, in petitioning for his release,
rested their case on the ground that all sentences given by a
court-martial were made illegal by the Petition of Right and the law
of the land. Such a doctrine would have dissolved the army into chaos,
and when Lilburne and Overton wrote to Fairfax, threatening him with
the fate of Joab and Strafford, all chance of pardon was at an end.
Lockyer firmly believed himself to be a martyr to the cause of right
and justice.”--S. R. Gardiner, _History of the Commonwealth_.
[121] See Whitelocke’s _Memorials_, “The Army’s Martyr,” “A True
Narrative,” and “The Moderate” (1649).
[122] “So die the Leveller corporals. Strong they, after their sort,
for the liberties of England; resolute to the very death.”--Carlyle.
[123] Lilburne’s attitude to Winstanley’s propaganda was similar to
the attitude of the political Chartists in the 19th century to Robert
Owen’s socialism.
[124] “Then ensued a scene, the like of which had in all probability
never been witnessed in an English court of justice, and was never
again to be witnessed till the seven bishops were freed by the verdict
of a jury from the rage of James II.”--S. R. Gardiner.
“In a revolution, where others argued about the respective rights of
king and parliament, he spoke always of the rights of the people. His
dauntless courage and his power of speech made him the idol of the
mob.”--Professor C. H. Firth, “Lilburne,” _Dictionary of National
Biography_.
[125] See L. A. Berens, _Digger Movement in the Days of the
Commonwealth_.
[126] _Clarke Papers_, vol. ii.
[127] Government rarely distinguishes between different schools of
agitators.
[128] Between 1710 and 1867 the number of acres so enclosed was
7,660,439.
[129] _Clarke Papers_, vol. ii.
[130] See Graham Wallas, _Life of Francis Place_.
[131] “Disappointment bitter and wide-spread was following closely upon
the inevitable failure of the extravagant expectations and overheated
hopes which the agitation for parliamentary reform had kindled.”--F.
York Powell, _The Queen’s Reign: a Survey_.
[132] See Graham Wallas, _Life of Francis Place_.
[133] Herbert Paul, _History of Modern England_.
[134] _Ibid._
[135] “Want of leaders and organization, and the great difference in
objects among the Chartists themselves, led to their failure. For a
while Chartism was stayed.”--Professor T. F. Tout, _England from 1689_.
[136] The differences between the two became more acute when Feargus
O’Connor started his land colonization schemes a few years later.
O’Brien opposed these schemes, which all ended in heavy financial
losses, and urged sticking to political reform. From 1842 O’Brien was
practically outside the Chartist movement, though it was not till 1848
he formally retired. He died in poverty in 1864, after giving some help
to the middle-class radical movement for household suffrage.
[137] A similar impulse fifty years later brought “Labour Churches”
into existence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account