Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic HistoryClayton, Joseph
History
Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic History
Clayton, Joseph
Democracy; Great Britain -- History
But Henry’s mind was made up. Residing largely in France, he would
have Thomas, Archbishop of Canterbury and Chancellor, to rule England
as his vice-regent. Six years had Thomas been the king’s friend and
chancellor, but the king did not know at all the real character of
his man, or rather it was inconceivable to the royal mind that
Thomas, whom the king had raised from a mere nobody, from Archdeacon
of Canterbury, an important ecclesiastic at best, to the chief man in
the realm, should ever dare set himself at variance with the king’s
will. Henry, with his untiring energy, was earnest enough for good
government in Church and State under an absolute monarchy, and he
counted on greater co-operation with Thomas in carrying out his plans,
were the latter archbishop. Hitherto, more than once the chancellor
had succeeded in moderating the king’s outbursts of wrath against some
hapless offender, but he had never shown himself a partisan of the
clergy at the expense of the commonwealth,[11] and his lack of pride in
his order had even incurred rebuke, so little of the ecclesiastic did
this statesman appear.
Thomas understood the king better than the king understood his
chancellor. But his protests were in vain. He was as surely marked for
the archbishopric as Anselm had been. Bishops of the province approved
and the monks of Canterbury duly voted for the king’s chancellor in
common consent, Gilbert Foliot, the Bishop of Hereford, and afterwards
of London, and the archbishop’s enemy to the end, alone opposing the
election.
“Then the archbishop-elect was by the king’s authority declared free of
all debts to the crown and given free to the Church of England, and in
that freedom he was received by the Church with the customary hymns and
words of praise.” (Herbert of Bosham.)
On June 2nd, 1162, the Saturday after Whit Sunday, Thomas was
ordained priest and on the following day consecrated bishop. (The new
archbishop instituted the festival of Trinity Sunday to commemorate
his consecration, and some 200 years later the festival was made of
general observance in the Catholic Church.) The king realised the
mistake he had made within a year of the consecration. The brilliant
chancellor was no sooner archbishop than he turned from all the
gaieties of the world, and while no less a statesman, adopted the life
of his monks--though never himself a monk--at Canterbury. Henceforth
Archbishop Thomas was the unflinching champion of the poor and them
that had no helper, the resolute defender of the liberties of the
Church against all who would make religion subject to the autocracy of
the king of England.
Thomas was forty-four years old, in the full strength of his manhood,
when he was made archbishop, and for eight years he did battle with the
crown, only laying down his charge at the call of martyrdom.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account