Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic HistoryClayton, Joseph
History
Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic History
Clayton, Joseph
Democracy; Great Britain -- History
Henry, bursting with anger, swore, “By God’s Eyes” it should be given
as revenue, and enscrolled as a king’s tax.
The archbishop replied with quiet determination, “aware lest by his
sufferance a custom should come in to the hurt of his successors,”
that, “by the reverence of those Eyes,” by which the king had sworn,
not one penny should be paid from his lands, or from the rights of
the Church. The king was silenced, no answer was forthcoming to the
objector, and the tax was paid as before to the sheriffs. But “the
indignation of the king was not set at rest,” and in October came the
Council of Westminster.
The king at once demanded that criminous clerks should not only
be punished in the Church Courts by the sentence of deprivation,
but should further be handed over to the King’s Courts for greater
penalties, alleging that those who were not restrained from crime by
the remembrance of their holy orders would care little for the loss of
such orders.
The archbishop replied quietly that this proposed new discipline was
contrary to the religious liberty of the land, and that he would never
agree to it. The Church was the one sanctuary against the barbarities
of the law, and Thomas to the end would maintain the security it
offered. More important it seemed to him that clerical offenders should
escape the king’s justice, than that all petty felons who could claim
the protection of the Church should be given over to mutilation by the
king’s officers. The bishops silently supported the primate in this
matter, though they told him plainly, “Better the liberties of the
Church perish than that we perish ourselves. Much must be yielded to
the malice of the times.”
Thomas answered this pitiful plea by admitting the times were bad.
“But,” he added, “are we to heap sin upon sin? It is when the Church is
in trouble, and not merely when the times are peaceful, that a bishop
must cleave to the right. No greater merit was there to the bishops of
old who gave their blood for the Church than there is now to those who
die in defence of her liberties.”
But the bishops were wavering, fearful of defying the king’s will. And
when Henry, defeated for the moment by the archbishop’s stand, angrily
called upon them to take an oath to observe in future “the royal
customs” of the realm as settled by his grandfather, Henry I., they all
agreed to do so, adding the clause “saving the rights of their order.”
The king objected, calling for the promise to be made “absolutely and
without qualifications,” until Thomas reminded him that the fealty the
bishops swore to give the crown “in life and limb and earthly honour”
was sworn “_salvo ordine suo_,” and that the “earthly honour” promise,
which included all the royal “customs” of Henry I., was not to be given
by bishops in any other way.
It was now late at night, and the king broke up the council in anger,
leaving the bishops to retire as they would.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account