Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic HistoryClayton, Joseph
History
Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic History
Clayton, Joseph
Democracy; Great Britain -- History
Richard Cœur de Lion, occupied with the crusades, had no mind for the
personal government of England. He depended on his ministers for money
to pay for his military expeditions to Palestine. England was to him
nothing more than a subject province to be bled by taxation. Both
William Longchamp and Hubert Walter--to whom Richard committed the
realm when he left England for good in 1194--did all that could be done
to meet the king’s demands. Government offices, earldoms and bishoprics
were sold to the highest bidder.[22] Judges bought their seats on the
bench and cities bought their charters. Crown lands already granted to
tenants were again taken up by the king’s authority, and the occupier
compelled to pay for readmission to his holding. Tournaments were
revived, because everyone taking part was obliged to take a royal
license. Even the great seal was broken by the justiciar’s authority,
and all documents signed by it had to be reissued, with the payment
of the usual fees (or stamp duties) for new contracts. “By these and
similar inquisitions England was reduced to poverty from one sea to the
other,” for more than £1,000,000 was sent to Richard by Hubert in the
first two years of his justiciarship.
The only protest against the general distress came from London, and not
from the aldermen or burghers, but from the voteless labouring people
upon whom the whole burden of raising the city’s taxes had been thrown.
Against this monstrous injustice William Longbeard FitzOsbert stood
out as the spokesman of the poor of London, and died a martyr for
their cause.
London’s political importance had been seen in the struggles against
King Cnut and William the Conqueror. Its remarkable influence in
national politics (an influence that endured to the middle of the
nineteenth century) was manifest when London acclaimed Stephen as King
of England in 1135. At the close of the twelfth century, London, with
the civic charter it had just obtained from Richard, with its thirteen
convent churches and more than a hundred parish churches within its
boundaries, with its great cattle market at Smithfield and its growing
riverside trade, was already prosperous and overcrowded. “The city was
blessed with the healthiness of the air and the nature of its site, in
the Christian religion, in the strength of its towers, the honour of
its citizens and the purity of its women; it was happy in its sports
and fruitful of high spirited men.” It had its darker side, but at that
time “the only plagues were the intemperate drinking of foolish people
and the frequent fires.”
Richard’s charter left to the citizens the business of assessing their
own taxes, and in 1196 there was trouble over this matter; for in
that year the city fathers decided that the large sums required by
Archbishop Hubert for the king’s needs should be paid in full by the
poorer craftsmen and labourers, who had no say in the matter.[23]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account