Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic HistoryClayton, Joseph
History
Leaders of the People: Studies in Democratic History
Clayton, Joseph
Democracy; Great Britain -- History
the very altar of Erdington Church, in Wiltshire, when he had said
mass, and put to death on a hill there by the infuriated people of his
diocese.[71]
Widespread as the discontent was in 1450, there was no general movement
throughout the land as in the days when John Ball and his companions
bound the peasants together by village clubs. Kent, “impatient in
wrongs, disdaining of too much oppression, and ever desirous of new
change and new fangleness,” was well organised for revolt, and the
men of Surrey and Sussex were ready to bear arms with Cade. Outside
these counties no one is found to have taken the lead against the
government. Kent and Sussex had their own reasons for revolt, for
piracy swept the English Channel unchecked, and the highways were
infested with robbers--soldiers broken in the war; and they had their
leader--Mortimer, whom some called “John Mendall” and others, later,
Jack Cade. So by the end of May a full list of grievances and necessary
reforms was drawn up, and the commons of Kent had, for the second time
in history, risen in arms and encamped on Blackheath, resolute to get
redress from the king for their injuries.
The success of democratic revolt depends largely on the clear courage
of its leaders and the complete confidence of the people in those
they elect for their captains. In 1450 Jack Cade proved himself
both clear-headed and brave, and the men of Kent followed him
whole-heartedly.
To this day we are still in the dark as to the real name and family of
the Captain of Kent. He was known popularly as “Mortimer,” and was so
described in the “pardon” he received. He was a man of some property,
or he would not have been attainted by special act of parliament, nor
have enjoyed the confidence of the men of substance who accepted his
generalship. He was known as an Irishman and as a soldier in the French
wars, and it is likely enough that he served under the Duke of York
both in France and Ireland. His strong advocacy of the claims of York
favours the notion of kinsmanship; but, on the other hand, York was by
far the ablest statesman of the day, and to demand his recall to the
king’s council was no guarantee of family motives.
There was some talk at the time that Cade was called John Aylesmere,
and that he was married to the daughter of a Surrey squire at Taundede.
But there is no more evidence for these things than for the charges
made against him in the warrant for his arrest, that he had once killed
a woman in Sussex and had then fled to France and fought with the
French arms.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account