Lectures and biographical sketchesEmerson, Ralph Waldo
Philosophy
Lectures and biographical sketches
Emerson, Ralph Waldo
American essays -- 19th century; Speeches, addresses, etc., American -- 19th century
Be not betrayed into undervaluing the churches which annoy you by
their bigoted claims. They too were real churches. They answered to
their times the same need as your rejection of them does to ours.
The Catholic Church has been immensely rich in men and influences.
Augustine, à Kempis, Fénelon, breathe the very spirit which now fires
you. So with Cudworth, More, Bunyan. I agree with them more than I
disagree. I agree with their heart and motive; my discontent is with
their limitations and surface and language. Their statement is grown
as fabulous as Dante’s Inferno. Their purpose is as real as Dante’s
sentiment and hatred of vice. Always put the best interpretation on
a tenet. Why not on Christianity, wholesome, sweet and poetic? It is
the record of a pure and holy soul, humble, absolutely disinterested,
a truth-speaker and bent on serving, teaching and uplifting men.
Christianity taught the capacity, the element, to love the All-perfect
without a stingy bargain for personal happiness. It taught that to love
him was happiness,--to love him in other’s virtues.
An era in human history is the life of Jesus; and the immense influence
for good leaves all the perversion and superstition almost harmless.
Mankind have been subdued to the acceptance of his doctrine, and cannot
spare the benefit of so pure a servant of truth and love.
Of course a hero so attractive to the hearts of millions drew the
hypocrite and the ambitious into his train, and they used his name to
falsify his history and undo his work. I fear that what is called
religion, but is perhaps pew-holding, not obeys but conceals the moral
sentiment. I put it to this simple test: Is a rich rogue made to
feel his roguery among divines or literary men? No? Then ’tis rogue
again under the cassock. What sort of respect can these preachers or
newspapers inspire by their weekly praises of texts and saints, when we
know that they would say just the same things if Beelzebub had written
the chapter, provided it stood where it does in the public opinion?
Anything but unbelief, anything but losing hold of the moral
intuitions, as betrayed in the clinging to a form of devotion or a
theological dogma; as if it was the liturgy, or the chapel, that was
sacred, and not justice and humility and the loving heart and serving
hand.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account