Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
Ancient chorography is not, like Roman antiquities, a department of
knowledge created by modern philology; the ancient authorities for it are
not inconsiderable, for they not only furnish the materials, but the work
of Strabo, for example, is an ample digest of them. The Greeks in general
took an intense interest in geography, and were in this respect quite
different from the Romans; there is no nation that could have done more
and that actually did less for geography than the Romans; they shewed a
perfect indifference in regard to the knowledge of their immense empire.
If we except the Germania of Tacitus, and a few passages in Caesar
about Britain and Germany, which are indeed excellent, Latin literature
furnishes nothing. Pomponius Mela and Pliny give only abridged summaries
of the knowledge possessed by their contemporaries. We know the extent of
Latin literature so perfectly as to be able to assert, that nothing of
importance is lost; the Romans never had a great chorographical work like
that which Strabo wrote for the Greeks.
But even before Strabo, the Greeks had great works of this kind; nay,
their earliest work in prose, of which we have any knowledge (if
we except the genealogies of Pherecydes, Acusilaus and others, the
simplicity of which is almost beyond our conception), the γῆς περίοδος
of Hecataeus the Milesian, was devoted to chorography. Its character is
not accurately described by any of the ancient authors, but we know
that the titles of his works were “Asia” and “Europe;” and we know from
Stephanus of Byzantium, that he mentioned an immense number of towns and
nations, though probably not in a systematic manner. He seems to have
connected separate narratives with one another, but his real objects were
chorography and ethnography, and not history, whence he is scarcely ever
quoted as an authority on historical matters. It is true, however, that
he did not entirely exclude historical events; it is very possible also
that he may have spoken of the revolt of the Ionians under Aristagoras,
in which he himself had acted so unfortunate a part; and there can be
little doubt that incidentally he also mentioned the history of the
countries of which he was treating.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account