Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
Let us now proceed to the southern coast of the Propontis. I will only
state in general, that the whole of the Asiatic side of the Hellespont,
as far as the entrance into the Propontis was completely covered with
Greek towns, nearly all of which, like Lampsacus and Dardanus, were
Aeolian; a few only were Ionian. But CYZICUS, on the south coast of
the Propontis, was a town which enjoyed great celebrity both in the
earlier and the somewhat later periods of antiquity. It is a disputed
point whether originally it was situated on a peninsula connected with
the mainland by a narrow neck, or whether it was in reality an island
which was artificially connected with the opposite coast by means of a
causeway. It was a Milesian colony, protected against the barbarians
by its isolated position, and it acquired importance at first by
agriculture, and afterwards by navigation and commerce. It is mentioned
by Thucydides and Xenophon, but its real greatness belongs to the
Macedonian period, when, to judge from its ruins and the vast number
of coins found there, it must have been a very large and wealthy city.
It is historically important on account of the siege during which its
inhabitants defended themselves bravely, resolutely, and heroically,
against Mithridates; the Romans rewarded them for it with distinctions
and favours of every kind; and Cyzicus, under the Romans, continued to be
a considerable city. It seems to have been destroyed during the Gothic
invasion in the third century; under the Byzantine emperors it was only a
small provincial town.
There were several other little Greek colonies on the same coast, such
as _Cios_, _Astacos_, and others, which were subsequently conquered by
the Bithynian kings, in consequence of which their names were changed. I
shall say more of them when I come to speak of Bithynia.
CHALCEDON, opposite to Byzantium, was according to tradition older than
it; it may have existed before, but certainly not as a Greek town. It is
likewise said to have been a Megarian colony; but it never was of any
historical importance. On coins it is called Καλχεδών, but in many MSS.
we find Καλχηδών, whence it is often confounded with Καρχηδών.
The Greek towns on the Thracian coast from the Bosporus onwards are
in themselves of no historical importance. MESEMBRIA was built by the
Byzantians at the time when, during the Ionian war, their own city had
been taken by the Persians. Nearly all settlements in those parts were
Ionian colonies sent out by Miletus, with the exception of CALATIS which
was a Dorian colony of Heraclea; but APOLLONIA and all places further on
as far as the Borysthenes are Milesian. All these towns as far as Olbia,
as I said before, are of no importance in history, if we except Tomi,
which derives its interest from the fact that Ovid lived there in exile.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account