Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
This kingdom had acquired considerable power even before the outbreak of
the Persian war; after that war, during which Amyntas had been obliged to
submit, affairs were for a time stagnating; Perdiccas at the beginning of
the Peloponnesian war was but a very contemptible enemy of the Athenians.
After the Peloponnesian war, too, Macedonia was so powerless and so much
inferior to Olynthus, that this city was enabled to take from it all
the country about the Thermaic gulf. Amyntas, the father of Philip, was
pressed extremely hard by the Illyrians, and was on the point of giving
up his country altogether: he implored the assistance of the Thebans,
and sent them his son as a hostage. These circumstances render it all
the more wonderful, that Philip raised his kingdom in so extraordinary a
manner: a greater contrast can hardly exist. Terrible as the history of
Philip is to every friend of Greece, it must nevertheless be owned that
he was an extraordinary man. In the very first year of his reign he laid
the foundation of the greatness of a state which was almost annihilated.
Although only twenty-four years old, he ascended the throne with mature
thoughts, and immediately set about carrying them into effect, not
scrupulous as to what means were most desirable, but only thinking how
he could make the best use of those at his command. And he did this
with uncommon surety and adroitness. He was quite aware that he lacked
the means of overcoming the Greek tactic by a higher one, as the Romans
did; he therefore endeavoured to overpower them with greater masses,
and in this he was successful. He did not, however, confine himself to
this course, but, like the Italian and Spanish courts of the sixteenth
century, became powerful by means of cunning, intrigues, faithlessness
and bribery. His plans, though favoured by the circumstances of the
time, would have been checked by great and towering difficulties, if he
had not carried them out by infamous means; he could not have destroyed
Olynthus, to mention one example, had he not deceived the Olynthians and
hired traitors in the place. At Philip’s death, Macedonia was already a
compact empire; its boundaries had been extended into Thrace as far as
Perinthus, and the Greek coast and the Greek towns belonged to it. The
Odrysian princes maintained themselves in the mountains of the interior,
in the neighbourhood of Adrianople. Thessaly had chosen Philip as its
protector, and the towns of eastern Epirus, Ambracia and Amphilochia, had
Macedonian garrisons. Every one knows in what manner Alexander extended
this empire. After his death, a new Macedonian kingdom arose under
the dynasty of Antipater, which, however, no longer embraced Thrace,
for that country then belonged to the dynasty of Lysimachus. We know
nothing about the boundaries of Macedonia and Thrace at that time; it
may have been the Strymon or the Nestus; we have nothing but the scanty
information in Diodorus. Afterwards Lysimachus united the two states,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account