Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
and Ptolemy Ceraunus appears still to have possessed the greater part
of the empire of Lysimachus in Thrace. Then follows the great invasion
of the Gauls, who made themselves masters of the whole of the northern
parts, until they established themselves in Thrace and Upper Macedonia.
Antigonus Gonatas restored Upper Macedonia and extended it as far as
the river Nestus, and Magnesia also belonged to it, though Thessaly was
only under the protection of Macedonia, just as Napoleon distinguished
between France and Italy.[96] We now have to draw a distinction between
Macedonia proper and Μακεδονία ἐπίκτητος. The latter comprised all the
country east of the river Strymon, that is, Magnesia, Orestis, and
probably also several small tribes in the Thessalian mountains, though
not the peninsulas of Pallene, Sithonia, and Athos, which were again
regarded as parts of Macedonia proper. Philip III. lost Magnesia and
Orestis, which fell into the hands of the Romans; but he recovered the
former, and for a time was in possession of the country of the Dolopians
and Athamanians.[97] This was the extent of Macedonia at the time
when the Romans conquered Perseus. They now separated Magnesia, and
divided the remaining country into four parts. Livy has here translated
Polybius somewhat hastily, but on the whole he has stated the division
rightly; the editions, however, are faulty, on account of the Vienna
MS.; criticism has yet much to do here, for the passage contains several
obscurities. These four districts would not interest us at all, were
it not that they are important in a numismatic point of view; we have
an extraordinary number of tetradrachmae belonging to them, although
the division into four districts did not exist longer than about twenty
years. The Roman governors, even after the abolition of autonomy, in
consequence of the revolt of the Pseudo-Philip, must have continued to
coin money with the same matrices, or else the barbarians, who otherwise
imitated Greek coins in quite a ridiculous manner and with numerous
faults, must in this instance have employed Greek die-cutters for the
purpose of imitation; this may have been the case, for example, with the
Gauls and other nations.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account