Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
The Illyrians are unquestionably the ancestors of the modern Albanese or
Arnauts. This opinion was expressed long ago, but has been disturbed in a
very strange way by objections; the one, that this people could not have
maintained itself among so many other nations, during great immigration,
is worth nothing. This objection gave rise to the belief that the
Albanese were an Asiatic people. Their language is quite peculiar and
akin to no other, neither to the Celtic, as I formerly believed, nor to
any other. In the earlier times, it is true, Celts did enter Illyricum,
and so did afterwards the Bulgarians and other nations, whence it cannot
be denied that northern and Asiatic nations did establish themselves in
the country. But I have discovered a proof which clearly shows, that
the modern Albanese are the same people as the ancient Illyrians. The
name of the town of Dimalon, the strongest among the Illyrian places,
with two acras on two heights, connected by a wall, as described by
Polybius, shows this; the Albanese still call it so. Now I have found in
several glossaries, that the word _mal_ signifies a hill, and _di_ two,
so that _dimal_ is a double hill. This proof is quite convincing. The
origin and nationality of the Illyrians have given rise to the oddest
conjectures. As the Dalmatian Slavonians have adopted the name Illyrians,
the Slavonian language spoken in Dalmatia, especially at Ragusa, is
likewise called Illyrian, and this designation has acquired general
currency. In the sixteenth century, about the time of the reformation,
a Slavonian Bible was printed at Tübingen, and called Illyrian. This
opinion is firmly rooted among the learned in Carniola, and we even find
it entertained by the excellent Kopitar, librarian at Vienna, and a very
distinguished man, who possesses great discernment and very extensive
knowledge; but he cannot get over the notion, that the ancient Illyrians
were Slavonians. This is, as it were, an article of the religious creed
of the Slavonians, just as the modern Greeks fancy that their language
is identical with the most ancient Greek. Wherever this singular opinion
has once become established, an angel from heaven would not be able to
upset it; learned men show an obstinacy on this point, which is really a
psychological curiosity. This opinion goes so far with them, that they
look upon St. Jerome, who was an Illyrian, as a Slavonian, and ascribe
to him the Slavonian translation of the Bible; for the same reason, they
call the artificial Glagolitian alphabet, which is derived from the
Cyrillian, invented in the ninth century, likewise Slavonian. Cyrillus
and Methodius, the apostles of the Slavonian nations, must have been
eminent men, for, with a wonderfully fine feeling for their language,
they invented an alphabet, as well defined and complete as possible;
this is the modern Servian alphabet, which is the foundation of that of
all the Slavonic languages. The Russian alphabet is the most complete
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account