Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
Attica did not form one state, and the boundary must have been altered
in some sense, so that during the time after Cleisthenes, the country
districts, formerly occupied by perioeci, obtained the full franchise,
as was the case, for example, with Salamis. Herodotus attests, that, in
his topical division of Attica into ten phylae, Cleisthenes gave to every
phyle ten demi. But at a later time Attica contained 174 demi. Strabo is
not the man to write down such a statement thoughtlessly; and moreover
the correctness of the number may be calculated from inscriptions and
grammarians, especially from Harpocration. It is, therefore, probable
that, as at Rome, when its territory was extended, the towns which
received the full franchise, were constituted as new local tribes, so
also at Athens new demi were formed under similar circumstances, without
there being any change in the number of the phylae. We might also explain
the change by the supposition that at first Cleisthenes allowed the
ancient γένη to continue, so that the φυλαὶ τοπικαί originally did not
contain the Eupatrids and the demi together; but afterwards, and even
before the Persian wars, this constitution was so altered, as to change
the most distinguished among the ancient γένη, of which only very few
remained, into separate demi, and incorporate them with the phylae, in
order to prevent their sinking into utter insignificance, and especially
their losing the right of voting. Thus the Butadae are mentioned both as
a γένος and as a δῆμος. Within such a γένος, which had become a δῆμος,
the real descendants of the ancient race were distinguished, by the
addition ἐτεο, from those who had become members of the same demos by
accident. This is the sense in which we have probably to understand the
often-mentioned Eteobutadae.
MEGARIS.
I shall treat of Megaris very briefly. It is that part of the Cecropian
Acte which was taken possession of by the Dorians when they extended
their dominion beyond Peloponnesus, in the hope of subduing all Attica,
which was then very weak. If we look at it within the limits which it
had at the time of the Peloponnesian war, it was as thoroughly Doric
as any part of Peloponnesus, and even in its dialect, notwithstanding
the probably small number of immigrants who, perhaps, formed only a
military colony. The town of MEGARA was, according to all appearances,
built by the Dorians; previously there existed no Megara. The version of
the passage in Homer, with which the Megarians opposed the proof of the
Athenians, does not mention Megara, but only Polichna, Nisaea, Tripodes,
and Aegirussa.[40] It was not an important town, and its whole territory
was small; if, however, we credit Herodotus’ account of their contingent
in the battle of Plataeae, it must have been extremely populous.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account