Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 1 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
NISAEA, the port of Megara, was older than the city, and is connected in
the traditions of the poets with Nisus and his daughter Scylla or Ciris;
and when the poets in this fable mention Megara, it must be regarded as
mere prolepsis. The Megarians were a maritime people, but not of great
importance; they had a small fleet at Nisaea, which was rather more
than a mile from the city, and was connected with it by two long walls
(σκέλη); the city itself was situated on a hill. The long walls were
built by the Athenians after the Persian wars, when they were masters of
Megaris. _Pagae_ or _Pegae_ was another town of Megaris on the Corinthian
Gulf, and contained a ship-wharf; it likewise had some ships, and was
strongly fortified.
The history of Megaris is not uninteresting; it is, in fact, that of
all the Greek peoples. In the earliest times it was governed by an
aristocracy, or rather oligarchy; then the demos rose, and the old
inhabitants, oppressed by the conquerors, were led by a man of the
highest rank, who set himself up as tyrant. This man was Theagenes. The
period of the overthrow of the aristocracy in all the states of Greece
and the rising of tyrants falls between Olymp. 30 and 70, a period which
may be likened to the 15th century in the middle ages. These τυραννίδες
were of a very different character from those of later times; they always
belonged to the first families, and were mere usurpations, without the
odiousness which generally attaches to the name. Their rule accordingly
was by no means hated, as it is when the tyrannis is the result of
general anarchy, or of the degeneracy of liberty. The ancient tyrannides
arose from a natural want, and from the consciousness that the state
could no longer be governed in the way in which it had been done before;
they were not cruel, because the sovereignty was not claimed by more than
one, so that there was no cause for making him bloodthirsty. If we bear
in mind this ancient meaning of the name, we cannot view the tyrannis in
an odious light. The tyrannis of later times is very different, for it no
longer helps to develop, but rules with cruelty over a mass which cannot
control itself. The later these tyrants are the worse they are; and the
worst of all are those after the time of Alexander, such as Aristodemus
of Elis, Agathocles and Apollonius of Cassandrea. After the fall of
Theagenes, the democracy ceased, and Megara, notwithstanding its Doric
character, was governed by an oligarchy, just as Corinth after the fall
of the Cypselids. During the Persian wars it was a flourishing state, but
afterwards it became involved in disputes with its powerful neighbours,
the Athenians; and by all kinds of insults offered to them, it drew
upon itself their anger; this was senseless, as it always is when the
weaker provokes the stronger. The Spartans undertook the Peloponnesian
war ostensibly to protect the Megarians, but Megara fared ill in that
war.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account