Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
About the time of Pyrrhus, the name Italy, in its whole extent, was
applied to the peninsula as far as the frontiers of Etruria and the river
Tiber. In this sense the name was used by the Greeks throughout the sixth
century, and probably by the Romans also, for both strictly separate the
rest of Italy from Etruria. There is a remarkable passage in Clemens
Alexandrinus, who, in his “Stromata,” says, “Italy which borders on
Etruria.” I do not quote Clemens as I would any other ancient Alexandrian
author, for he did absolutely nothing but copy from the writers of
the sixth century, that is, from those who lived about the time of
Aristarchus; and he stops short there, because the authors from whose
works he made his compilations, belonged to that period alone. Clemens is
generally viewed in too favourable a light; still, however, he contains
abundant materials, and no philologer ought to neglect him. When Etruria
became more and more Romanised, though there were no Roman colonies in
the interior of the country, and when the idea of other states existing
in Italy by the side of Rome, vanished, another step was made in advance,
and the name Italy was applied to the whole peninsula as far as the foot
of the Alps; and in this sense Italy is spoken of by Polybius. Another
question cannot, perhaps, be answered; it is this: did he include Liguria
under the name of Italy?—did he employ the term Alps in such a manner
as to comprise the Ligurian mountains between the coast of Genoa as far
as the Po?—or did he extend the boundaries of Italy and Gaul from the
Macra as far as the territory of Modena about the Po, then continuing
them south of the Po, near Placentia and Parma, beyond the river, so as
to make them run west of the Ticinus as far as the mountains? The last
is the more probable, as it is the more natural line. In the official
language of the Romans, the Rubicon formed the boundary of Italy, so that
even Ravenna and the three Legations, which were otherwise not Gallic,
were included in Cisalpine Gaul. Augustus was the first to add Cisalpine
Gaul to Italy, so as to make the river Varus the frontier towards Gaul,
and the town of Pola towards Istria. People may think of Augustus as they
please; I do not praise him, nor do I blame him; his arrangements were
great, and have exercised an influence upon the history of the world;
his divisions of Rome and Italy became permanent. His division of Italy
remained in force for a period of a thousand years, that is, down to the
time of the Ottos, the Saxon emperors; and this durability shows that the
divisions were based upon a necessary and natural foundation, whence,
with the exception of slight changes, they remained during subsequent
periods. On the side of Istria, the boundary has become somewhat
narrower, in consequence of the change of the population, which in Istria
became Slavonian. Under the emperors after Maximinian it became customary
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account