Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
This coast, then, was thickly studded with towns, the more ancient ones
were Tyrian, and the more recent ones Carthaginian settlements. The
inhabitants of the latter are called _Libyphoenices_, whence, from their
very name, we cannot suppose that they were of pure Punic blood: they
were Punians who had admitted Africans among them, and their language was
a corrupt Punic. The Carthaginians were greatly inclined to mix with, and
admit other tribes, which accounts for the fact of their language being
so widely spread: all the civilisation adopted by the Africans was Punic.
The Carthaginians had a peculiar Libyan alphabet, and when the writing
of the Tuariks is once discovered, I hope the Carthaginian inscriptions
also will be deciphered. Their literature, however, was Punic. The Romans
gave the library of Carthage as a present to the kings of Numidia;
that library contained the native historical records of Africa, from
which such singular statements were extracted by Sallust in composing
his Jugurtha, and the key to which must still be discovered: they did
not contain real history, but we can see from them in what light those
nations regarded their history.
The language of the original inhabitants of northern Africa was
perhaps more widely spread than any other: this is the language of the
Berbers, which was once spoken from the Canary islands in the west to
the cataracts of the Nile, and in some parts it is spoken even at the
present day. It is singular that the nation speaking that language
embraced tribes of quite different physical characters, whites as well
as blacks (though not negroes); the ancients, in fact, distinguish
between Gaetulians and Melanogaetulians, though they regard them as one
nation. Harsh rudeness was a generally prevailing characteristic of the
nation, but in proportion to the extent of country occupied by it, it
was not numerous; at present their descendants occur only in the oases
of the desert, while formerly they extended from the Mediterranean to
the banks of the Niger; on the coast they have nearly everywhere been
displaced by the Arabs, who are still gaining ground, so that now they
are found only in some parts of Algiers and Morocco. The Romans called
them _Afri_, and the Greeks, Λίβυες; it has been supposed that the latter
name is connected with that of Levante or Leguante. The name by which
the nation designates itself, viz., Amazirgh, Mazirgh, or Mzirgh, is
found, according to an observation of Castiglione, even in Herodotus,
who speaks of Μάσυες; this is the correct form occurring in the MSS.,
instead of which the printed editions erroneously give Μάξυες. The name
_Massaesyli_, which was given to the western Libyans between the lesser
Syrtis and the Ocean, also is nothing but Mazirgh Shilha, for they also
call themselves Shilhas. The eastern tribes are called _Massyli_, which
is the same as Μάσυες, for the termination _yli_ seems to be the common
Italian one, which we find in _Aequuli_ for _Aequi_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account