Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
The Carthaginians
probably called them by this name. The bilingual inscriptions, which
exist in considerable numbers, would throw more light upon the language
of those countries, if they were deciphered, and they may possibly
contain the key by which the Punic inscriptions also are to be explained.
It is singular that the Romans called those nations _Numidae_, which
is not a proper name, but a common noun. The Greek form was νομάδες,
and from this the Romans made _Numidae_, a circumstance which shows to
what extent Greek words were in common use among the Romans. Afterwards
_Numida_ and _Numidia_ became names of the nation and the country, so
that, no doubt, Masinissa called himself king of Numidia. These tribes
extended from the boundary of the Carthaginian territory to the river
Molochath (Mulucha), which still may be regarded as the frontier of
Algiers. We must not, however, suppose that the country beyond that
river was occupied by a different race, for it was only another tribe
of the same stock. These latter were called _Mauri_ (Μαυροὶ, Blacks, in
the Alexandrian dialect), a name which became as firmly established for
the western tribes as Numidae was for the eastern ones. The country in
the south, between Mount Atlas and the Sahara, as far as the Niger, was
inhabited by the _Gaetuli_ and _Melanogaetuli_, the modern Tuariks. The
Melanogaetuli were unquestionably of the same race as the Gaetuli, but
had no doubt arisen from a mixture with the Aethiopians, who dwelt there.
They were accordingly a dark mixed race like that at present in Darfoor.
We do not know by what name they called themselves.
The _Garamantes_ are placed too far to the south-east in our maps; they
were the inhabitants of the modern Fezzan, and the present town of Germa
was their capital, where Roman inscriptions are still found among the
ruins. The dominion of the Romans in those parts, about which nothing is
said by ancient geographers, belongs to the second century, when they
extended their power in different directions, for under Trajan they
entered far into the interior of Arabia, and in Nubia they advanced as
far as Dongola, the surrounding tribes being too weak to offer effectual
resistance. The distance between Tripoli and Fezzan is about forty days’
journey. The town of _Augila_, mentioned by Herodotus, in the country
of the Nasamones, is called to this day Audyeelah or Eudyeelah; the
name of the Nasamones themselves has not yet been re-discovered. Count
Castiglione has written a very beautiful essay on those countries in
the form of an appendix to his work entitled “Les Monnaies des Arabes
frappées en Afrique.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account