Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
All ancient temples consist of two main parts, the cella and the space in
front of the cella. The latter might be constructed in different ways,
it might be sheltered by a roof, or exposed to the open air, in which
case it was enclosed by four walls or a portico all around. We generally
imagine the altar to have been in the temple itself; in the ancient
Christian churches (_basilicae_) it always stood in the _apsis_, but in
the temples it did not belong to the cella of the gods, but to the space
in front of it. The cella was generally open, but could be closed; it
was usually very small. The Roman temples often were of extremely small
dimensions, and at present I scarcely know a chapel of an equally small
size, not even in Italy, where there are some incredibly little chapels;
for there were temples of which the cella was only seven or eight feet
in diameter. The cella contained the statue of the god (τὸ ἕδος), and
for this reason it was necessary to have the altar outside in the centre
of the space in front of the cella, which was either exposed to the open
air, or could easily be aired, because the statue, in consequence of the
burnt sacrifices, might have become disfigured by smoke or otherwise,
and because the bones and the like might easily have created foul air
in the cella and thus produced injurious effects. In the temple of the
Capitoline Jupiter, the cella was divided into three sacella, separated
by walls, for Jupiter, Juno, and Minerva. But this cella was only the
smallest part of the building; the larger was the space before it, where
the ordinary donaria were hung up, except the more precious gifts, which
were kept in the favissae, or large catacombs under the temple in the
lautumiae. It is possible that they might still be discovered; a few
traces of them are visible in the garden of duke Caffarelli. In the
twelfth century, under Pope Anacletus II., large ruins still existed; but
a church was erected upon them, which bore the name _S. Salvatoris in
maximis_ (supply _ruinis_), but has been destroyed long ago. Such names
must always be attended to, for they often lead to important discoveries.
The heaps of rubbish lying below by the side of the river, belong
no doubt to the temple, and if excavations were made, many valuable
treasures might be discovered. I often proposed in vain to dig in the
favissae, but as I have given some impulse, I hope people will be roused
from their indifference.[19]
The hills not only had the same extent which they still have, but must
have extended much further at the time when the valleys were more
distinct. Thus a part of the Forum, properly speaking, belonged to the
Capitoline hill. The _carcer_ was at the north-eastern extremity; its
construction is ascribed to Ancus Marcius, the founder of the plebeian
order; it seems to have been intended for the plebeians, for the
patricians would probably not have tolerated the idea of such a thing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account