Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
The word _platea_ is likewise one of those which may mislead, and of
which only vague notions are current. The general opinion, I believe,
is, that platea signifies a broad street on account of its derivation
from the Greek πλατεῖα; but it is something else; it is what we call
_place_ or _piazza_. In the early times of Rome the name does not seem
to have been used; it occurs only at a later period, when an intercourse
was established with Greece. We have to understand by it a wide open
space, such as we have in front of many large buildings; but not a
market-place. The authority which has enabled me to establish this as the
real meaning of the word, shows how necessary it is for an historical
philologer not to limit his reading: for I know it from several passages
of St. Augustin’s work, “De Civitate Dei.” St. Augustin, one of the
greatest minds, ought to be recommended on account of his intellect,
and independently of any historical information which his works may
furnish; his genius is a mighty one, and was extremely developed in
that agitated period, which forms the boundary line between the ancient
and modern world. In his account of the conquest of Rome by the Goths,
which he gives merely in passing, there are passages from which it is
quite evident that _platea_ is a space such as I have described before.
These are generally speaking, the only open spaces which Rome, after its
rebuilding since the middle ages, now possesses, as, for example, the
Piazza di Spagna below the Collis Hortulorum; a large place of the size
of the market-place of Bonn is scarcely to be found at Rome.
The first _aqueduct_ was built by Appius Caecus during the second Samnite
war; it was very low, and for the most part under ground. It led to
the Aventine, and was intended to provide a supply of good water to
the districts between that hill and the Tiber, which had scarcely any
water but that of the river. Water is still derived in one place, and I
believe even in two, from this aqueduct, without most people being aware
of it. It was built under ground, because the enemies sometimes advanced
to the very neighbourhood of Rome, and might, therefore, easily have
cut off the supply of water. Afterwards the number of aqueducts at Rome
rose to fourteen. Fresh water is a real blessing to the inhabitants of
the south; one must have lived there in order to comprehend that these
aqueducts were not a matter of luxury. The _Aqua Marcia_ led to the
Capitol; of the _Aqua Virgo_ (now Acqua di Trevi) a large _specus_ is
still visible. The greatest aqueduct was that of the emperor Claudius,
which was preserved as late as the eighth century of the Christian era;
it might easily have been restored; its arches were taken down gradually
after the restoration of Rome in the sixteenth century, because people
wanted the bricks to build their houses.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account