Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 (of 2) : $b comprising Greece and her colonies, Epirus, Macedonia, Illyricum, Italy, Gaul, Spain, Britain, the north of Africa, etc.
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Ethnology; Geography, Ancient; History, Ancient
Both these Ausonian nations lived within the boundaries of Latium in
its wider sense. The Volscians were subdivided into smaller parts, the
Antiatan, Ecetranian, and other Volscians without any definite name. All
the coast towns, as far as the upper Liris, were Volscian, as e.g. Anxur
or Terracina, Privernum, Sora, Arpinum, Fabrataria, Fregellae, etc. The
Aequians, on the other hand, dwelt on the one side as far as Praeneste,
and on the other as far as lake Fucinus in the north. The Aequians and
Volscians are almost always mentioned together, just as Romans and
Latins, whence it is probable that isopolity existed between the two
nations. Every man belonging to one nation might take up his abode among
the other with which it was in isopolity: he there enjoyed higher rights
than an alien; he was not, indeed, a full citizen, but a free member of
the community; he was what was termed in the middle ages a pale-burgher.
This is a relation which, on the whole, is seldom rightly understood by
German jurists, and even by K. F. Eichhorn, who, in other respects, is
a man of the greatest merit in matters of German law. Such an isopolity
must have existed between the Aequians and Volscians; but besides this,
they must have had another political connection, for a large party of the
Aequians very frequently made common cause with a numerous body of the
Volscians.
It is an important point to decide, as to whether the Volscians always
inhabited the towns on the coast from Antium as far as Terracina,
which are called Volscian, or whether they took possession of them as
conquerors. At first I shared in the general error, thinking that they
had always been Volscian; afterwards, I began to doubt—the first step
towards truth—and to consider the possibility of its being otherwise;
and now I am convinced that the country was originally inhabited by
Tyrrhenians, that it was afterwards conquered by the Volscians, and that
this event did not occur till after the banishment of the kings. All the
places on the coast from Terracina to Antium, as well as Velitrae in the
interior, were once Pelasgian, and may be justly called Latin, this being
the ancient and common name. Receive this result of my inquiries with
confidence; there is no danger of your being mistaken. In like manner,
the Aequians extended their dominion in the direction of the Latins and
Hernicans at the expense of both.
All the Volscians did not form one common state: the people of Arpinum,
Sora, Anxur, Formiae, and Fundi may, at the time of their first conquest,
have mutually assisted one another; but when their possessions were
secured, when Antium and Ecetrae had become Volscian, the towns situated
farther behind probably did not exert themselves for the other Volscian
places.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account