[37] His name is variously spelt Rainolds, Rainoldes, Reinolds, Reynolds. [38] See Dr. WILLIAM BARLOW’S _Sum and Substance of the Conference which it pleased his Excellent Majesty to have with the Lords Bishops, and others of his Clergy, in his Majesty’s Privy Chamber at Hampton Court, Jan. 1603_ (o.s.). Reprinted in _The Phenix: or a Revival of Scarce and Valuable Pieces_, p. 157. Lond. 1707. [39] Rendered in the Bishops’ and the Great Bible, “and bordereth upon the city which is now called Jerusalem,” instead of, “and answered to Jerusalem which now is.” [40] Rendered in the Great Bible and Prayer Book Psalter, “they were not obedient,” instead of, “they were not disobedient,” as in Genevan, or “they rebelled not,” as in our present Bibles. [41] Rendered in the Great Bible and Prayer Book Psalter, “and prayed,” instead of, “and executed judgment.” [42] See LEWIS, _History of the English Translations of the Bible_, p. 313; or EADIE, _The English Bible_, vol. ii. p. 180; or WESTCOTT, _History of the English Bible_, p. 113. The king’s letter is given in full by CARDWELL, _Documentary Annals of the Reformed Church of England_, vol. ii. p. 65, ed. 1839. [43] For the names of the Revisers of 1611 see Appendix H. [44] That is, the Great Bible; called Whitchurch’s, from the name of one of the printers. [45] BURNET, _History of the Reformation_, part ii., Appendix, p. 368, ed. 1681. [46] One of whom, Dr. Samuel Ward, had himself taken part in the English revision. [47] Tables of Genealogies and a description of the Holy Land are found prefixed to many early editions of King James’s Bible. [48] _Acta Synodi Dordrechti habitæ_, p. 19, ed. 1620. [49] CARDWELL, _Documentary Annals_, vol. ii. p. 68, ed. 1839. [50] See Appendix F. [51] For a list of the Revisers see Appendix H. [52] In some cases, however, this further subdivision of work seems to have taken place. Anthony Walker, in his _Life of John Bois_, p. 47 (reprinted in PECK’S _Desiderata Curiosa_), says: “Sure I am that Part of the Apocrypha was allotted to him (for he hath showed me the very copy he translated by), but to my Grief I know not what part.” Bois was a member of the company to which the Apocrypha was assigned. Walker goes on to say, “All the time he was about his own Part, his Commons were given to him at St. Johns, where he abode all the week till Saturday night; and then he went home to discharge his Cure, returning thence on Monday morning. When he had finished his own part, at the earnest request of him to whom it was assigned he undertook a Second, and then he was to common in another College. But I forbear to name both the person and the House.” [53] The bare fact that the Oxford Revisers met in Rainolds’ lodgings is mentioned by WOOD, _Historia Univ. Oxon._, vol. i. p. 311, and is referred to by STOUGHTON, _Our English Bible_, p. 248.