Legal antiquities : $b A collection of essays upon ancient laws and customsWhite, Edward J. (Edward Joseph)
History
Legal antiquities : $b A collection of essays upon ancient laws and customs
White, Edward J. (Edward Joseph)
Criminal law -- History; Law -- History; Law, Ancient; Punishment -- History
With the era now existing, these old issues and customs are dead and
buried out of sight and we would not be mad enough to revive them, if we
could. They played no unimportant part, however, in the pathetic drama
of the evolution of the race and we ought to erect monuments to their
memory, as it were, and occasionally wander back to scatter flowers upon
the monumental shaft, without deserting the live issues and duties at
present confronting us.
When we contemplate the lessons of the past, as presented in these “Legal
Antiquities,” we can but realize the plain truth, expressed by William
Knox, that “We are the same our fathers have been,” for if we had lived
and moved and had our being in the dark days when these customs obtained,
we would have considered them in the same light that our fore-fathers
viewed them and this should make us charitable toward these frailties
and mistakes of the past; we should be comforted with the reflection
that such institutions are but mile-stones of the centuries, marking the
rapid progress of the race, but when we read of these customs of the men
and women of antiquity, we can but realize the truth of the words of
Longfellow, that
“... the world is very old,
And generations pass as they have passed,
A troop of shadows, moving with the sun.”
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Exodus, XXIII., 2.
[2] Judge Davidson, of Texas, in Ex parte Martinez, 145 S. W. Rep. 959,
1023.
CHAPTER I.
MARRIAGE LAWS AND CUSTOMS.
The term marriage was defined, in the Institutes of Justinian, as the
lawful union of a man and a woman, including an inseparable association
of their lives.[1]
Written almost fourteen centuries ago, few, if any, of the many
definitions of marriage, improve upon that given in the Institutes of
this old philosopher-lawyer-Emperor of the Romans.[2]
As the basis of the marriage contract is the necessity of society for
some rule for the appropriation of the opposite sexes to one another and
the protection of that relation, when once established, it is in one form
or another, the oldest institution of man and the source of our most
antique laws and customs.[3]
The Chinese inform us that in the beginning, human beings, like other
animals, without morality or community laws, wandered through the
plains and forests, using their women in common; that the offspring
of such unions knew their mothers, but rarely knew who their fathers
were and that this custom continued among men, until the Emperor Fou-hi
established the marriage custom.[4]
While the ancient “Heathen Chinese” were thus holding their women in
common, there is evidence that among the old Teutons and Hindus, the
“marriage by capture” and “rape marriages” were still recognized by law,
long before the “bride-sale” or “sale marriages,” so generally obtaining
in ancient Assyria and Babylon, were established in Germany.[5]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account