This, then, is our idea. We suppose that the plants that have lived in
past years have decayed to form a black material like leaf mould which
stops in the soil, giving it a darkish colour. The more mould there
is, the darker the colour of the soil. We know that along with this
decay there is a great deal of shrinkage. As the black material is
formed from the plant, it only extends as far into the soil as the
plant roots go, so that there is a sharp change in colour about 6
inches below the surface (see also p. 2). Like the plant the black
material all burns away when the soil is heated sufficiently.
Thus we can explain all the facts we have observed, and in what seems a
very likely way. This does not show that our supposition is correct,
but only that it is useful. When you come to study science subjects
you will find such suppositions, or hypotheses as they are called, are
frequently used so long as they are found to be helpful. In our
present case we could only get absolute proof that the black
combustible part of the soil really arose from the decay of plants by
watching the process of soil formation. We shall turn later to this
subject.
The black material is known as humus. Farmers and gardeners like a
black soil containing a good deal of humus because they find it very
rich, and we shall see later on why this is so. Vast areas of such
soils occurring in Manitoba, in Russia, and in Hungary are used for
{37} wheat growing, while there are also areas in the Fen districts of
England.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account