Now let us look at these results carefully. The experiment with
surface soil shows that the pieces of stem and leaf have furnished a
good deal of food to the mustard and have caused a gain of 24.3 grams
in the crop. If we knew what the pieces were made of we {51} could
push the experiment still further and find out more about plant food,
but this involves chemical problems and must be left alone for the
present. We can, however, say that plant remains are an important
source of plant food, and since we suppose the black material of the
soil to be made of plant remains (see p. 36), it will be quite fair to
say also that this black material, the humus, is a source of plant
food. We have therefore answered the question we set, and we can
explain some at any rate of the differences between the surface soil
and the subsoil. The surface soil contains a great deal of the black
material, which forms plant food, while the subsoil does not. Thus
plants grow well on the surface soil and starve on the subsoil. We can
also explain why gardeners and farmers speak of black soils as rich
soils; they contain more than other soils of this black material that
makes plant food. Still further, we can explain why the farmer often
sows plants like mustard, tares or clover, and then ploughs them into
the ground. They are not wasted, but they make food for the next crop
that goes in.
Now let us turn to the results of the subsoil experiments. The leaves
and stems have increased the crop, but only by 5.4 grams: they have not
been nearly so effective as in the surface soil. It is evident that
the mustard did not feed directly on the leaves and stems put in; if it
had there should have been an equal gain in both cases. The leaves and
stems clearly have to undergo some change before they are made into
plant food and the soil has something to do with this change. After
the crops are cut the soils should be tipped out and examined. More of
the original pieces of leaf and stem are found in the subsoil than in
the surface {52} soil. That is to say, there has been more change in
Pot 6 containing surface soil than in Pot 7 containing subsoil. The
"something," whatever it may be, that changes plant remains like
leaves, stems, pieces of grass, roots, etc. into plant food therefore
acts better in the surface soil than in the subsoil. Here then we have
another difference between surface and subsoils.
SUMMARY. The experimental results obtained in this chapter may now be
summed up as follows:--
(1) Plant food is present in the top soil only and not to any extent in
the subsoil.
(2) There is not much present, so little indeed that we could not
detect it by weighing.
(3) It is, however, always being made in the top soil, if water is
present. Only little is made from the subsoil.
(4) The remains of leaves, stems, roots, etc. furnish an important
source of plant food.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account