Letters of Alexander von Humboldt to Varnhagen von Ense.: From 1827 to 1858. With extracts from Varnhagen's diaries, and letters of Varnhagen and others to Humboldt — John Shaqi
Letters of Alexander von Humboldt to Varnhagen von Ense.: From 1827 to 1858. With extracts from Varnhagen's diaries, and letters of Varnhagen and others to HumboldtHumboldt, Alexander von
History
Letters of Alexander von Humboldt to Varnhagen von Ense.: From 1827 to 1858. With extracts from Varnhagen's diaries, and letters of Varnhagen and others to Humboldt
Humboldt, Alexander von
Humboldt, Alexander von, 1769-1859 -- Correspondence
Goerres and Schelling understand coloring better. I thus feel only
interested in what is dramatic and in the talents exhibited, or not
exhibited, therein. Caesaropapacy, territorial system, nay, even “the
authority of a _distinctly positive doctrine, and marked physiognomy_,”
for which Marheineke (p. 41) has a tendency, are abominations, and are
mere carnival buffoonery to me. Both parties are mere compressing
machines of different kinds, and a philosophically proved Christian
dogmatism of “marked physiognomy,” this seems to me the most offensive
of all strait-waistcoats.
Raumer (Carl) has published “Crusades”—crusades against the geognosts.
The Saracens are Leopold von Buch (your newly converted one), and
myself.
A. HT.
And Sintenis at Magdeburg and the State’s Council at Neufchatel, “who
have prohibited the deluge!” And all that in the year 1840! Three comets
are not enough!
I received a letter from the Marquis Clanricarde, at St. Petersburg, on
the 5th of March, stating, “that nothing was heard for four or five
weeks from the expedition to Chiwa. It is purely an attack upon the
Khan, whom they propose to dethrone, and to put his brother in the
place.” You see that he wishes to appear very tranquil! What meek
politics!
42.
METTERNICH TO HUMBOLDT.
VIENNA, _29th of March, 1840_.
MY DEAR BARON—Though I do not doubt that the Crown-Prince, to whom I had
the honor of replying to-day, will inform you of my declaration, I refer
you to my letter to his Royal Highness. You will see that I have placed
myself at his disposal, with a reservation, however, prescribed by my
ignorance of archæology. To my ignorance upon this point must be added
my ignorance upon another—I mean the duties of the Presidency. I desire
to state, at all events, what I think of the relations of a single
member with any scientific association. There are three sorts of
men—some are true savans; the number of these is small: others are
friends of science in general, or of some branch of it; these are more
numerous: the third class—the largest of all—comprises the
narrow-minded, the barren in spirit, the “_viveurs_,” to whom, though
often they are very good fellows, art and science are quite superfluous.
I enrol myself in the second of these classes. My brethren and I can be
of some service to mental cultivation, provided we do not meddle too
much with details. When I feel that I can do a good work, I consider it
my duty to devote myself to it. In the present case, however, I can only
throw my good-will into the scale.
My confession of faith is set forth in the explanations given to the
August Protector; and to what I took the liberty of stating to him, I
also take the liberty of referring you.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account