Letters of Alexander von Humboldt to Varnhagen von Ense.: From 1827 to 1858. With extracts from Varnhagen's diaries, and letters of Varnhagen and others to HumboldtHumboldt, Alexander von
History
Letters of Alexander von Humboldt to Varnhagen von Ense.: From 1827 to 1858. With extracts from Varnhagen's diaries, and letters of Varnhagen and others to Humboldt
Humboldt, Alexander von
Humboldt, Alexander von, 1769-1859 -- Correspondence
El Dios de cielo es delicado mucho en suffrir compañero en ninguna cosa
y se pica del abuso del poder humano. Si Dios se causa de las
monarchias, dara otra forma al mundo.
The God of Heaven is very jealous about admitting a co-partner in
anything whatsoever: He is offended by every abuse of human power.
Should God once be tired of monarchies, he will give another form to the
political world.
A. HUMBOLDT.
101.
HUMBOLDT TO VARNHAGEN.
POTSDAM, _October 2d, 1845_.
The curious little note containing the prophecy “that God would become
tired of kings,” was lying for many days on my desk, awaiting my
delivering it to you, in person, my dearest friend. Whenever anything
worth reading falls into my hands during the late hours of my solitary
study in the chateau here, I always think of you. As I have hitherto
been prevented by my efforts to arrange the manner of Buelow’s discharge
from calling on you, I have thought best to send you, dear friend, the
little sheet, under envelope. My reason for quoting this prophecy is,
the general state of public affairs, which provokes my highest
indignation. Every day discloses something worse. The future looks
gloomy and menacing, the greatest carelessness prevails.
I have just returned from Tegel, where the Buelows would be very happy
to see you. They beg especially that you will gratify them next winter
by frequent calls at their town residence.
In the “Westminster Review” a certain Dr. Cross says, the style of
Kosmos is lengthened, and very indifferent; the frequent reflection on
sentiment was deemed very superfluous by English savans—such a book did
not contain any thing new. Then follows the denunciation of Atheism,
although “creation” and the “created world” are never lost sight of in
the book. And did I not, only eight months ago, in the French
translation, say, in the plainest terms:—It is this necessity of things,
this occult but permanent connexion, this periodical return in the
progress, development of formation, phenomena, and events, which
constitute _Nature_ submissive to a controlling power. _Physics_, as the
name itself implies, can only deduce the phenomena of the physical world
from the properties of matter; the highest aim of experimental science
is therefore to ascend to the existence of the laws, and progressively
to generalise the same. Whatever lies beyond is no object for _physical
demonstration_, it belongs to another order of _more elevated_
speculations. Immanuel Kant, one of the few philosophers whom no one has
yet accused of impiety, has, with rare sagacity, indicated the limits of
physical explanation in his renowned _Essai sur la Théorie et la
Construction des Cieux_. Koenigsberg, 1755.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account