Letters of Edward FitzGerald, in Two Volumes. Vol. 1 — John Shaqi
Letters of Edward FitzGerald, in Two Volumes. Vol. 1FitzGerald, Edward
General
Letters of Edward FitzGerald, in Two Volumes. Vol. 1
FitzGerald, Edward
Authors, English -- 19th century -- Correspondence; FitzGerald, Edward, 1809-1883 -- Correspondence
* Doesn't this name express heavy clay? {79b}
MY DEAR THOMPSON,
I wish you would write to me ten lines to say how you are. You are, I
suppose, at Cambridge: and I am buried (with all my fine parts, what a
shame) here: so that I hear of nobody--except that Spedding and I abuse
each other about Shakespeare occasionally: a subject on which you must
know that he has lost his conscience, if ever he had any. For what did
Dr. Allen . . . say when he felt Spedding's head? Why, that all his
bumps were so tempered that there was no merit in his sobriety--then what
would have been the use of a Conscience to him? Q. E. D.
Since I saw you, I have entered into a decidedly agricultural course of
conduct: read books about composts, etc. I walk about in the fields also
where the people are at work, and the more dirt accumulates on my shoes,
the more I think I know. Is not this all funny? Gibbon might elegantly
compare my retirement from the cares and splendours of the world to that
of Diocletian. Have you read Thackeray's little book--the second Funeral
of Napoleon? If not, pray do; and buy it, and ask others to buy it: as
each copy sold puts 7.5_d._ in T.'s pocket: which is very empty just now,
I take it. I think this book is the best thing he has done. What an
account there is of the Emperor Nicholas in Kemble's last Review, {80a}
the last sentence of it (which can be by no other man in Europe but Jack
himself) has been meat and drink to me for a fortnight. The electric eel
at the Adelaide Gallery is nothing to it. Then Edgeworth fires away
about the Odes of Pindar, {80b} and Donne is very aesthetic about Mr.
Hallam's Book. {80c} What is the meaning of 'exegetical'? Till I know
that, how can I understand the Review?
Pray remember me kindly to Blakesley, Heath, and such other potentates as
I knew in the days before they 'assumed the purple.' I am reading
Gibbon, and see nothing but this d---d colour before my eyes. It changes
occasionally to bright yellow, which is (is it?) the Imperial colour in
China, and also the antithesis to purple (_vide_ Coleridge and Eastlake's
Goethe)--even as the Eastern and Western Dynasties are antithetical, and
yet, by the law of extremes, potentially the same (_vide_ Coleridge,
etc.) Is this aesthetic? is this exegetical? How glad I shall be if you
can assure me that it is. But, nonsense apart and begged-pardon-for,
pray write me a line to say how you are, directing to this pretty place.
'The soil is in general a moist and retentive clay: with a subsoil or pan
of an adhesive silicious brick formation: adapted to the growth of wheat,
beans, and clover--requiring however a summer fallow (as is generally
stipulated in the lease) every fourth year, etc.' This is not an
unpleasing style on Agricultural subjects--nor an uncommon one.
_To F. Tennyson_.
BOULGE HALL, WOODBRIDGE.
[21 March, 1841.]
DEAR FREDERIC TENNYSON,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account