Letters of Edward FitzGerald, in Two Volumes. Vol. 2FitzGerald, Edward
General
Letters of Edward FitzGerald, in Two Volumes. Vol. 2
FitzGerald, Edward
Authors, English -- 19th century -- Correspondence; FitzGerald, Edward, 1809-1883 -- Correspondence
That word '_Magnus_' rules in Lucretius as much as 'Nequicquam.' I was
rejoiced to meet Tennyson quoted in the notes too, and my old Montaigne
who discourses so on the text of
Pascit amore avidos inhians in te, Dea, visus. [i. 36.]
Ask Mr. Munro, when he reprints, to quote old Montaigne's Version of
Nam verae voces tum demum, etc. [iii. 57.]
'A ce dernier rolle de la Mort, et de nous, il n'y a plus que feindre, il
faut parler Francais; il faut montrer ce qu'il y a de bon et de net dans
le fond du pot.' {219a} And tell him (damn my impudence!) I don't like
my old Fathers '_dancing_' under the yellow and ferruginous awnings.
{219b} . . .
There is a coincidence with Bacon in verses 1026-9 of Book II.
(Lucretius, I mean).
_To John Allen_.
MY DEAR ARCHDEACON,
I have little else to send you in reply to your letter (which I believe
however was in reply to one of mine) except the enclosed from Notes and
Queries: which I think you will like to read, and to return to me.
I think I will send you (when I can lay hand on it) two volumes of some
one's Memorials of Wesley's Family: which you can look over, if you do
not read, and return to me also. I wonder at your writing to me that I
gave you his Journal so long as thirty years ago. I scarce knew that I
was so constant in my Affections: and yet I think I do _not_ change in
literary cases. Pray read Southey's Life of him again: it does not tell
all, I think, which might be told of Wesley's own character from his own
Mouth: but then it errs on the right side: it does not presumptuously
guess at Qualities and Motives which are not to be found in Wesley:
unlike Carlyle and the modern Historians, Southey, I think, cannot be
wrong by keeping so much within the bounds of Conjecture: Conjecture
about any other Man's Soul and Motives!
_To FitzEdward Hall_. {220a}
WOODBRIDGE: _June_ 24 [1877].
MY DEAR SIR,
I have run through your _Ability_ {220b} again, since I sent it to
Wright: but as I before said (I believe) am not a competent Critic. I
know that I coincide (unless I misconstrue) with your Canons laid down at
pp. 162, etc. I am for all words that are smooth, or strong, (as the
meaning requires) which have proved their worth by general admission into
the Language. '_Reliable_' is, what '_trustworthy_' is not, good current
coin for general use, though '_trustworthy_' may be good too for
occasional emphasis.
I remember old Hudson Gurney cavilling a little at '_realize_' as I
innocently used the word in a Memoir of my old Bernard Barton near thirty
years ago: this word I have also seen branded as American; let America
furnish us with more such words; better than what our 'old English'
pedants supply, with their '_Fore-word_' for 'Preface,' '_Folk-lore_,'
and other such conglomerate consonants. Odd, that a Lawyer (Sugden)
should have lubricated '_Hand-book_' by a sort of Persian process into
'Handy-book'!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account