Letters of John Huss, written during his exile and imprisonment : $b With Martin Luther's preface; and containing a general view of the works of HussHus, Jan
History
Letters of John Huss, written during his exile and imprisonment : $b With Martin Luther's preface; and containing a general view of the works of Huss
Hus, Jan
Bohemia (Czech Republic) -- Church history -- Middle Ages, 600-1500 -- Sources; Christian heretics -- Czech Republic -- Bohemia -- Correspondence; Council of Constance (1414-1418 : Konstanz, Germany) -- History -- Sources; Hus, Jan, 1369?-1415 -- Correspondence; Hus, Jan, 1369?-1415. De ecclesia; Hu
I have heard from some persons worthy of faith, that the Emperor
Maximilian said, in speaking of John Huss, “They have done great
injustice to that excellent man.” Erasmus of Rotterdam, in his early
writings, now in my possession, has declared that John Huss had been
burned, but not convinced; and the general opinion amongst pious men
of that day was, that he had been loaded with outrage and violence.
I will relate here what Dr Staupitz narrated to me of a conversation
which he had with his predecessor, Andrew Prolès, a man of birth and
merit, relative to the rose of Dr John Zacharias. This Zacharias
was represented in the cloisters bearing a rose in his hat, as a
distinction for him, and an affront to John Huss. Prolès, seeing this
image, said, “I would not consent to wear that rose.” Staupitz having
inquired for what motive, Prolès replied, “When it was maintained
before the Council of Constance against John Huss, that the pope could
not be represented by any one, Dr Zacharias brought forward the passage
of Ezekiel (chap. xxxiv.), _It is I who am above the shepherds, and not
the people._[19] John Huss denied that these words could be found to
form part of the chapter alluded to; and Zacharias offered to prove the
contrary, from the very Bible which John Huss had brought from Bohemia:
for Zacharias, like many others, had often visited Huss for the
purpose of convincing him, and he had by chance happened to perceive
the passage in question. The Bible was then produced in the assembly,
and it shewed that Zacharias was right. John Huss, nevertheless,
maintained that the Bible was not a correct one, and that the other
versions would not confirm it; but being overwhelmed by the clamours
of his adversaries, he lost his cause, and Zacharias received a rose
from the Council, in perpetual memory of this fact. And yet,” observed
Prolès, “it is certain that these words are not found in any correct
Bible, whether manuscript or printed, and that they all testify against
Zacharias.” Such was the account of Prolès to Dr Staupitz.
The verse alluded to is found in all German, Latin, Greek, and Hebrew
Bibles, as it was quoted by John Huss; but at Constance they could not
admit it in any other way than as quoted by Zacharias, who deserved
neither to receive the rose nor to wear it.
The adversaries of John Huss’s opinions have themselves testified
to his learning. Thirty years back, I heard several able theologians
declare that “John Huss was an exceedingly superior doctor, and that
he surpassed in erudition and knowledge all the persons composing the
council.” His writings, and, amongst others, his _Treatise on the
Church_, and his _Sermons_, confirm this eulogium.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account