Letters of John Keats to Fanny Brawne: Written in the years MDCCCXIX and MDCCCXX and now given from the original manuscriptsKeats, John
General
Letters of John Keats to Fanny Brawne: Written in the years MDCCCXIX and MDCCCXX and now given from the original manuscripts
Keats, John
Brawne, Fanny, 1800-1865 -- Correspondence; Keats, John, 1795-1821 -- Correspondence; Poets, English -- 19th century -- Correspondence
My dearest Fanny, I slept well last night and am no worse this
morning for it. Day by day if I am not deceived I get a more
unrestrain’d use of my Chest. The nearer a racer gets to the
Goal the more his anxiety becomes; so I lingering upon the
borders of health feel my impatience increase. Perhaps on your
account I have imagined my illness more serious than it is:
how horrid was the chance of slipping into the ground instead
of into your arms—the difference is amazing Love. Death must
come at last; Man must die, as Shallow says; but before that
is my fate I fain would try what more pleasures than you have
given, so sweet a creature as you can give. Let me have another
opportunity of years before me and I will not die without
being remember’d. Take care of yourself dear that we may both
be well in the Summer. I do not at all fatigue myself with
writing, having merely to put a line or two here and there, a
Task which would worry a stout state of the body and mind, but
which just suits me as I can do no more.
Your affectionate
J. K.
[Illustration]
[Illustration]
[Illustration]
[Illustration]
XXVIII.
My dearest Fanny,
I had a better night last night than I have had since my
attack, and this morning I am the same as when you saw me. I
have been turning over two volumes of Letters written between
Rousseau and two Ladies in the perplexed strain of mingled
finesse and sentiment in which the Ladies and gentlemen of
those days were so clever, and which is still prevalent among
Ladies of this Country who live in a state of reasoning
romance. The likeness however only extends to the mannerism,
not to the dexterity. What would Rousseau have said at seeing
our little correspondence! What would his Ladies have said!
I don’t care much—I would sooner have Shakspeare’s opinion
about the matter. The common gossiping of washerwomen must be
less disgusting than the continual and eternal fence and attack
of Rousseau and these sublime Petticoats. One calls herself
Clara and her friend Julia, two of Rousseau’s heroines—they all
[_sic_, but qy. _at_] the same time christen poor Jean Jacques
St. Preux—who is the pure cavalier of his famous novel. Thank
God I am born in England with our own great Men before my eyes.
Thank God that you are fair and can love me without being
Letter-written and sentimentaliz’d into it.—Mr. Barry Cornwall
has sent me another Book, his first, with a polite note.[46] I
must do what I can to make him sensible of the esteem I have
for his kindness. If this north east would take a turn it would
be so much the better for me. Good bye, my love, my dear love,
my beauty—
love me for ever.
J. K.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account