Letters on the Improvement of the Mind, Addressed to a LadyChapone, Mrs. (Hester)
Religion
Letters on the Improvement of the Mind, Addressed to a Lady
Chapone, Mrs. (Hester)
Women -- Education; Young women -- Conduct of life
In the case of real injuries, which justify and call for resentment,
there is a noble and generous kind of anger, a proper and necessary part
of our nature, which has nothing in it sinful or degrading. I would not
wish you insensible to this; for the person, who feels not an injury,
must be incapable of being properly affected by benefits. With those,
who treat you ill without provocation, you ought to maintain your own
dignity. But, in order to do this, whilst you show a sense of their
improper behaviour, you must preserve calmness, and even good-breeding;
and thereby convince them of the impotence as well as injustice of
their malice. You must also weigh every circumstance with candour and
charity, and consider whether your showing the resentment deserved may
not produce ill consequences to innocent persons--as is almost always
the case in family quarrels; and whether it may not occasion the breach
of some duty, or necessary connection, to which you ought to sacrifice
even your just resentments. Above all things, take care that a
particular offence to you does not make you unjust to the general
character of the offending person. Generous anger does not preclude
esteem for whatever is really estimable, nor does it destroy good-will
to the person of its object: it even inspires the desire of overcoming
him by benefits, and wishes to inflict no other punishment than the
regret of having injured one who deserved his kindness: it is always
placable, and ready to be reconciled, as soon as the offender is
convinced of his error; nor can any subsequent injury provoke it to
recur to past disobligations, which had been once forgiven. But it is
perhaps unnecessary to give rules for this case. The consciousness of
injured innocence naturally produces dignity, and usually prevents
excess of anger. Our passion is most unruly, when we are conscious of
blame, and when we apprehend that we have laid ourselves open to
contempt. Where we know we have been wrong, the least injustice in the
degree of blame imputed to us, excites our bitterest resentment; but,
where we know ourselves faultless, the sharpest accusation excites pity
or contempt, rather than rage. Whenever, therefore, you feel yourself
very angry, suspect yourself to be in the wrong, and resolve to stand
the decision of your own conscience before you cast upon another the
punishment, which is perhaps due to yourself. This self-examination will
at least give you time to cool, and, if you are just, will dispose you
to balance your own wrong with that of your antagonist, and to settle
the account with him on equal terms.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account