Letters to "The Times" upon War and Neutrality (1881-1920) — John Shaqi
Letters to "The Times" upon War and Neutrality (1881-1920)Holland, Thomas Erskine
History
Letters to "The Times" upon War and Neutrality (1881-1920)
Holland, Thomas Erskine
Neutrality; War (International law)
"A great step has been made in our own day by the
establishment of compulsory military service, which introduces
the educated classes into armies. The brutal and violent
element is, of course, still there, but it is no longer alone,
as once it was. Again, Governments have two powerful means of
preventing the worst kind of excesses--strict discipline
maintained in time of peace, so that the soldier has become
habituated to it, and care on the part of the department which
provides for the subsistence of troops in the field. If that
care fails, discipline can only be imperfectly maintained. It
is impossible for the soldier who endures sufferings,
hardships, fatigues, who meets danger, to take only 'in
proportion to the resources of the country.' He must take
whatever is needful for his existence. We cannot ask him for
what is superhuman.
"The greatest kindness in war is to bring it to a speedy
conclusion. It should be allowable with that view to employ
all methods save those which are absolutely objectionable
('dazu müssen alle nicht geradezu verwerfliche Mittel
freistehen'). I can by no means profess agreement with the
Declaration of St. Petersburg when it asserts that 'the
weakening of the military forces of the enemy' is the only
lawful procedure in war. No, you must attack all the resources
of the enemy's Government: its finances, its railways, its
stores, and even its prestige. Thus energetically, and yet
with a moderation previously unknown, was the late war against
France conducted. The issue of the campaign was decided in two
months, and the fighting did not become embittered till a
revolutionary Government, unfortunately for the country,
prolonged the war for four more months.
"I am glad to see that the manual, in clear and precise
articles, pays more attention to the necessities of war than
has been paid by previous attempts. But for Governments to
recognise these rules will not be enough to insure that they
shall be observed. It has long been a universally recognised
custom of warfare that a flag of truce must not be fired on,
and yet we have seen that rule violated on several occasions
during the late war.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account