Letters written in France, to a friend in London, between the month of November 1794, and the month of May 1795Tench, Watkin
History
Letters written in France, to a friend in London, between the month of November 1794, and the month of May 1795
Tench, Watkin
France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799 -- Personal narratives, British; Tench, Watkin, 1759?-1833 -- Correspondence
The remainder of this letter shall be dedicated to a detail of those
detached parts of their naval institutions, customs, and present state,
which I have been enabled to pick up. In general I think them inferior,
because less easily practicable, to our own, but many of them deserve
consideration. “_Fas est et ab hoste doceri._”
The discipline of their men struck me at the first view as contemptible;
and yet I must confess that I was surprized by the state of
subordination in which I afterwards found them. The seaman or soldier
addresses his commander by the title of _Citoyen_, and receives in
return the same appellation; but in the five weeks I have lived among
them, I have witnessed only one instance of disobedience. The offender
was a soldier, who refused to assist in performing some of the ordinary
duties of the ship. A court-martial, or _conseil de discipline_ as they
call it, was immediately holden upon him, by order of Captain Le Franq,
who prosecuted. It consisted of a lieutenant of the ship and three
seamen, and of two serjeants and a corporal of the troops. The prisoner
pleaded ignorance of the law on this head; and that when he had
voluntarily enrolled himself to serve as a soldier, it was under an
idea of not being _compelled_ to do that which _ought to be the result
of inclination_ only. This defence was deemed so unsatisfactory, that
the offender was sentenced to three months imprisonment on shore.
All the judicial institutions of their navy, and the punishments allowed
to be inflicted, as well as the cases to which they apply, are strictly
defined. The _conseil de discipline_ is impowered to try only inferior
officers and men. The officers of the _état major_ (answering nearly to
those of our ward-room) and all above them, can be tried only by a board
of officers, who assemble in the admiral’s ship. Neither of these courts
has the power of condemning to death: all offences of a capital nature
must be tried before the revolutionary tribunal. The punishments
enjoined are flogging in certain cases, the number of lashes being
limited; running the gantlope; ducking from the yard-arm; confinement on
shore, or in the lion’s den (boatswain’s store-room); stoppage of pay;
and degradation. The three last extend to officers. A prisoner’s
allowance of wine is always stopped. No man can be punished but by a
sentence of the _conseil de discipline_; and, in carrying on the
service of the ship, it is positively directed, that no “French citizen”
shall, on any account whatever, be struck; but he may be _pushed_ as
violently as may be found necessary. For giving a box on the ear an
officer would be cashiered; but to dash a man’s head against the ship’s
side, so as to crush his nose, or beat out his teeth, by rushing
suddenly upon him, is allowable.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account