Liberty in the modern stateLaski, Harold J. (Harold Joseph)
Science
Liberty in the modern state
Laski, Harold J. (Harold Joseph)
Liberty; Political science
Let me illustrate my view with reference to one or two of the decisive
factors in the Peace of Versailles. No one now believes the wartime lie
that Germany was solely responsible for the war; her responsibility may
be greater than that of some others, but it is agreed that the burden
of Russia is at least as heavy and that war, in any case, was rooted
in the nature of the European system. But, in the interest of national
unity, it was regarded as essential to represent Germany as the sole
conspirator against European peace. She was painted as a malefactor
whose sins were incapable of exaggeration. Her virtues were denied, her
achievements belittled, until what Mr Lippmann terms a “stereotype” of
her was built up for public use which made her appear to the average
man a criminal who could not be too severely punished. The statesmen
who constructed this stereotype knew that it was untrue; but they
hoped, doubtless, to escape its consequences, when the victory had been
won. They found that they could not do so. They had so successfully
repressed all effort at reasonable delineation, that the atmosphere
of hate was unconquerable. They had no alternative to a Carthaginian
peace because that seemed, to the masses they had deceived, the
only possible course for justice to take. They knew, as the famous
memorandum, for instance, of Mr. Lloyd George makes manifest,[32] that
a Carthaginian peace was disastrous for Europe; but it was too late to
destroy the legend they had created. Like those whom Dante describes in
the Inferno, they were punished by the realization of their announced
desires.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account