Liberty in the modern stateLaski, Harold J. (Harold Joseph)
Science
Liberty in the modern state
Laski, Harold J. (Harold Joseph)
Liberty; Political science
We are in the difficulty that every step we take towards freedom is a
step towards the equalization of privileges now held unequally. Those
who hold them are not anxious to abandon what they entail; sometimes
they can even persuade themselves that the well-being of society
depends upon a refusal to surrender them. For them, therefore, the
honest publication of facts, the making of free minds, are simply
paths to disaster. Why should they surrender their weapons of defence?
Why, the more, when many of them do not even suspect that they fight
with poisoned weapons? To explain to a loyal Roman Catholic that he
should tell his children that there is grave reason to deny the truth
of all he believes is to invite him to shatter the foundation upon
which he has built his life. To suggest to the average citizen who
took part in the Great War that his school-books should abandon the
legend that his particular state entered it with the whole-souled
motive of serving justice would appear scandalous simply because he
is honestly unconscious of any other motive. To urge even upon the
public-spirited heir to a great estate the possible duty of acting upon
the principle of Mill’s argument about the laws of inheritance is, at
the best, an adventure in the lesser hope. There was good reason for
the unpopularity of the Socratic temper in Athens.
II
I conclude, therefore, that whatever our mechanisms and institutions,
liberty can hope to emerge and to be maintained in a society where
men are, broadly speaking, equally interested in its emergency and
its maintenance. I accept the insight Harrington had when he insisted
that the distribution of economic power in a state will control the
distribution of its political power. I think James Madison was right
when he argued that property is the only durable source of faction. I
think the perception of the early socialists entirely justified when
they urged that a society divided into a small number of rich, and
a large number of poor persons, will be a society of exploiters and
exploited. I cannot believe that, in such an atmosphere, liberty will
be a matter of serious concern to the possessors of power.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account