A voluminous _History of Plants_ had been published in 1751 by Sir John
Hill[63], the first superintendent to be appointed to the Royal Gardens,
Kew. In the _History_ lichens are included under the Class “Mosses,” and
are divided into several vaguely limited “genera”—_Usnea_, tree mosses,
consisting of filaments only; _Platysma_, flat branched tree mosses,
such as lung-wort; _Cladonia_, the orchil and coralline mosses, such
as _Cladonia furcata_; _Pyxidium_, the cup-mosses; and _Placodium_,
the crustaceous, friable or gelatinous forms. A number of plants are
somewhat obscurely described under each genus. Not only were these new
_Lichen_ genera suggested by him, but among his plants are such binomials
as _Usnea compressa_, _Platysma corniculatum_, _Cladonia furcata_ and
_Cladonia tophacea_; other lichens are trinomial or are indicated, in
the way then customary, by a whole sentence. Hill’s studies embraced
a wide variety of subjects; he had flashes of insight, but not enough
concentration to make an effective application of his ideas. In his
_Flora Britannica_[64], which was compiled after the publication of
Linnaeus’s _Species Plantarum_, he abandoned his own arrangement in
favour of the one introduced by Linnaeus and accepted again the single
genus _Lichen_.
Sir William Watson[65], a London apothecary and physician of scientific
repute at this period, proposed a rearrangement and some alteration of
Linnaeus’s sections. He had failed to grasp the principle of development,
but he gives a good general account of the various groups. Watson was the
progenitor of those who decry the makers and multipliers of species. So
in regard to Micheli, who had increased the number to “298,” he writes:
“it is to be regretted, that so indefatigable an author, one whose
genius particularly led him to scrutinize the minuter subjects of the
science, should have been so solicitous to increase the number of species
under all his genera: an error this, which tends to great confusion and
embarrassment, and must retard the progress and real improvement of the
botanic science.” Linnaeus however in redressing the balance earned his
full approbation: “He has so far retrenched the genus (_Lichen_) that in
his general enumeration of plants he recounts only 80 species belonging
to it.”
Linnaeus’s binomial system was almost at once adopted by the whole
botanical world and the discovery and tabulation of lichens as well as
of other plants proceeded apace. Scopoli’s[66] _Flora Carniolica_, for
instance, published in 1760, still adhered to the old descriptive method
of nomenclature, but a second edition, issued twelve years later, is
based on the new system: it includes 54 lichen species.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account