The Antarctic Zone and the neighbouring lands are less hospitable to
plant life than the northern regions, and there is practically no
accumulation of detritus. Collections have been made by explorers, and
several lists have been published which include a marvellous number of
species common to both Poles, if the subantarctic lands are included in
the survey. An analytic study of the various lists has been published
by Darbishire[1073]. He recognizes 106 true Antarctic lichens half of
which are Arctic as well. The greater number are crustaceous and are
plants common also to other lands though a certain number are endemic.
The most abundant genera in species as well as individuals are _Lecidea_
and _Lecanora_. Several bright yellow species of _Placodium_—_Pl.
elegans_, _Pl. murorum_, etc., are there as at the North Pole. Among
the larger forms, _Parmeliae_, _Cetrariae_, and _Cladoniae_ are fairly
numerous; _Usneae_ and _Ramalinae_ rather uncommon, while members of the
Stictaceae are much more abundant than in the North. The common species
of _Peltigera_ also occur in Antarctica, though _P. aphthosa_ and _P.
venosa_ are wanting; both of these latter are boreal species. Darbishire
adds that lichens have so great a capacity to withstand cold, that they
are only checked by the snow covering, and were bare rocks to be found
at the South Pole, he is sure lichens would take possession of them.
The most southerly point at which any plant has been found is 78° South
latitude and 162° East longitude, in which locality the lichen _Lecanora
subfusca_ was collected by members of Scott’s Antarctic expedition
(1901-1904) at a height of 5000 ft.
A somewhat different view of the Antarctic lichen flora is indicated by
Hue[1072] in his account of the plants brought back by the second French
Antarctic Expedition. The collection was an extremely favourable and
important one: great blocks of stone with their communities of lichens
were secured, and these blocks were entirely covered, the crustaceous
species, especially, spreading over every inch of space.
Hue determined 126 species, but as 15 of these came from the Magellan
regions only 111 were truly Antarctic. Of these 90 are new species, 29
of them belonging to the genus _Buellia_. Hue considers, therefore, that
in Antarctica there is a flora that, with the exception of cosmopolitan
species, is different from every other, and is special to these southern
regions. Darbishire himself described 34 new Antarctic species, but only
10 of these are from true Antarctica; the others were collected in South
Georgia, the Falkland Islands or Tierra del Fuego. Even though many
species are endemic in the south, the fact remains that a remarkable
number of lichens which occur intermediately on mountain summits are
common to both Polar areas.
C. LICHENS OF THE TEMPERATE ZONES
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account