_Mechanism of Reparation._—Gernez some years later made known the
mechanism of this reparation, or, at least, its immediate cause. He
showed that on the injured surface the crystal becomes less soluble
than on the other facets. This is not, however, an exceptional
phenomenon. It is, on the contrary, quite frequently observed that the
different faces of a crystal show marked differences in solubility.
This is what happens in every case for the mutilated face in comparison
with the others; the matter is less soluble there. The consequence
of this is clear; the growth must preponderate on that face, since
there the mother liquor will become super-saturated before being
super-saturated for the others. We may explain this result in another
way. Each face of the crystal in contact with the mother liquor is
exposed to two antagonistic actions: The matter deposited upon a
surface may be taken away and redissolved if, for any reason whatever,
such matter becomes more soluble than that of the liquid stratum in
contact with it; in the second place, the matter of this liquid stratum
may, under contrary conditions, be deposited, and thus increase the
body of the crystal. There is, then, for each point of the crystalline
facet, a positive operation of deposit which results in a gain, and a
negative operation of redissolution which results in a loss. One or
the other effect predominates according as the relative solubility is
greater or less for the matter of the facet under consideration. On the
mutilated surface it is diminished, deposition then prevails.
But this is only the immediate cause of the phenomenon; and if we wish
to know why the solubility has diminished on the mutilated surface
Ostwald explains it to us by showing that crystallization tends to form
a polyhedron in which the surface energy is a relative minimum.
CHAPTER VI.
NUTRITION IN THE LIVING BEING AND IN THE CRYSTAL.
Assimilation and growth in the crystal.—Methods of growth
in the crystal and in the living being; intussusception;
apposition.—Secondary and unimportant character of the process of
intussusception.
I have already stated (Chap. VI. p. 209) that nutrition may be
considered as the most characteristic and essential property of living
beings. Such beings are in a state of continual exchange with the
surrounding medium. They assimilate and dissimilate. By assimilation
the substance of their being increases at the expense of the
surrounding alimentary material, which is rendered similar to that of
the being itself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account