_Life is the Sum-total of the Phenomena Common to all Living Beings.
Elementary Life._—Living beings differ more in form and configuration
than in their manner of being. They are distinguished more by their
anatomy than by their physiology. There are, in fact, phenomena common
to all, from the highest to the lowest. This is because there is that
similar or identical foundation, that _quid commune_ which has enabled
us to apply to them the common name of “living beings.” Claude Bernard
gave to this sum-total of manifestations common to all (nutrition,
reproduction) the name of _elementary life_. To him _general
physiology_ was _the study of elementary life_; the two expressions
were equivalent, and they were equivalent to a longer formula which
the illustrious biologist has given as a title to one of his most
celebrated works—_The Study of the Phenomena Common to all Living
Beings, Animals, and Plants_. From this point of view each being is
distinguished from another being as a given _individual_ and as a
particular _species_; but all are in some way alike and thus resemble
one another: common life, elementary life, the essential phenomena of
life; it is _life itself_.[4]
[4] Le Dantec has objected to this conception of phenomena common to
different living beings. He insists that all phenomena which take
place in a given living being are proper to him, and differ, however
slightly, from those of another individual. The objection is more
specious than real.
The manifestations of life may therefore be regarded from the point
of view of what is most general among them. As we go down the scale
of anatomical organization, as we pass from apparatus (circulatory,
digestive, respiratory, nervous) to the _organs_ which compose them,
from the organs to the _tissues_, and finally from the tissues to the
_anatomical elements_ or _cells_ of which they are formed, we approach
that common, physiological dynamism which is _elementary life_, but we
do not actually reach it. The cell, the anatomical element, is still a
complicated structure. The elementary fact is further from us and lower
down. It is in the living matter, in the molecule of this matter, and
there we must seek it.
Galen gave in days gone by as the object of researches on life, the
knowledge of the use of the different organs of the animal machine;
“de usu partium.” Later, Bichat assigned to them as their end the
determination of the _properties of tissues_. Modern anatomists and
zoologists try to reach the constituent element of these tissue—the
cell. Their dream is to construct a _cellular physiology_, a
_physiological cytology_; but we must go further than that.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account