most biologists of our own time, or disciples of Lavoisier, as most
physiologists of the present day, have passed far beyond the ideas of
Descartes. They would reject the coarse materialism of the celebrated
philosopher. They would no longer consider the living organism as a
machine, composed of nothing but wheels, springs, levers, presses,
sieves, pipes, and valves; or again of matrasses, retorts, or alembics,
as the iatro-mechanicians and would-be chemists of other days believed.
All that is changed, at any rate in form. If we look back only thirty
or forty years we see that the old doctrines have undergone more or
less profound modifications. The changes of form, which have been
made necessary by the acquisitions of contemporary science, enable us
to appreciate its progress. They enable us to give an account of the
progress of biology, and for this reason they deserve to be examined
with some attention. It is into this examination that I ask my readers
to accompany me.
CHAPTER II.
ANIMISM.
The Common Characteristic of Animism and Vitalism: the Human
Statue—Primitive Animism—Stahl’s Animism—First Objection with
Reference to the Relation between Soul and Body—Second Objection: the
Unconscious Character of Vital Operations—Twofold Modality of the
Soul—Continuity of the Soul and Life.
Children are taught that there are three kingdoms in Nature—the mineral
kingdom and the two living kingdoms, animal and vegetable. This is the
whole of the sensible world. Then above all that is placed the world of
the soul. School-boys therefore have no doubts on the doctrines that we
discuss here. They have the solution. To them there are three distinct
spheres, three separate worlds—matter, life, and thought.
It is this preconceived idea that we are about to examine. Current
opinion solves _a priori_ the question of the fundamental homogeneity
or lack of resemblance of these three orders of phenomena—the phenomena
of inanimate nature, of living nature, and of the thinking soul.
_Animism_, _vitalism_, and _monism_ are, in reality, different ways of
looking at them. They are the different answers to this question:—Are
vital, psychic, and physico-chemical manifestations essentially
distinct? Vitalists distinguish between life and thought, animists
identify them. In the opposite camp mechanicians, materialists, or
monists make the same mistake as the animists, but to that mistake they
add another: they assimilate the forces at play in animals and plants
to the general forces of the universe; they confuse all three—soul,
life, inanimate nature.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account