Christian ethics -- Fiction; Christian fiction; Conduct of life -- Fiction
_The Life and Death of Mr Badman_ was published by John Bunyan in
1680, two years after the First Edition of the First Part of _The
Pilgrim’s Progress_. In the opening sentence of his preface he tells
us it was intended by him as the counterpart or companion picture
to the Allegory. But whatever his own intentions may have been, the
Public of his own time seem to have declined to accept the book in this
capacity. Indeed, another writer, who signs himself T. S., undertook
to complete Bunyan’s Allegory for him, in a book in size and type
closely resembling it, and entitled _The Second Part of the Pilgrim’s
Progress . . . exactly Described under the Similitude of a Dream_. It
was printed for Jho. Malthus at the Sun in the Poultry, and published
in 1683. So far as is known, only one copy of this book is now in
existence, the copy which was formerly in the library of the poet
Southey and now in that of the Baptist Union. Upon this Bunyan seems to
have changed his purpose, so far as _The Life and Death of Mr Badman_
was concerned, and on the first of January, 1685, published the story
of Christiana and her Children as his own Second Part of _The Pilgrim’s
Progress_.
The work before us, therefore, now stands apart by itself. In its
composition Bunyan seems to have been greatly influenced, so far as
form is concerned, by a book which his wife brought with her on her
marriage, and which, as he tells us in his _Grace Abounding_, they read
together. It was entitled _The Plaine Man’s Pathway to Heaven_: By
Arthur Dent, Preacher of the Word of God at South Shoobury in Essex.
The eleventh impression, the earliest now known, is dated 1609. Both
books are in dialogue form, and in each case the dialogue is supposed
to be carried on through one long day. Bunyan’s _Mr Wiseman_, like
Dent’s _Theologus_, holds forth instructive discourse, while the _Mr
Attentive_ of the former, like the _Philagathus_ of the latter, listens
and draws on his teacher by friendly questionings. There is not in
Bunyan’s conference, as there is in Dent’s, an _Asunetus_, who plays
the part of an ignorant man to come out enlightened and convinced at
last, or an _Antilegon_, who carps and cavils all the way; and there is
not in Dent’s book what there is in Bunyan’s, a biographical narrative
connecting the various parts of the dialogue; but the groundwork of
each is the same—a searching manifestation and exposure of the nature
and evils of various forms of immorality.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account