Life and literature in the Roman republicFrank, Tenney
History
Life and literature in the Roman republic
Frank, Tenney
Latin literature -- History and criticism; Rome -- Intellectual life
With Pompey’s accession to the consulship the fortunes of the knights,
who had suffered untold disasters under Sulla, reached a turning point.
The restoration of the censorship meant among other things that the
equestrian corporations were again to be assigned provincial contracts;
the restoration of the tribuneship meant that they would not have to
appeal to the hostile senate for desired administrative measures; the
revision of the court panels gave back to them both power and prestige.
Since Pompey proved to be their friend they determined to honor him and
use him further. In 67 they demanded that the seas be cleared of pirates
so that the commerce in which they were interested would be protected;
and they demanded that Pompey be placed in command of the war with
extraordinary powers. When the senate objected, the knights, resting
their arguments upon Gracchan precedents, took the bill directly to
the assembly. The senate considered this revolutionary. The populace,
flattered by this appeal to their assembly and favorably disposed to
Pompey, supported the knights. When the senate induced a tribune to veto
the measure, Gabinius, assuming the validity of the Gracchan theory of
“recall,” threatened to present a bill to depose this tribune, thereby
forcing him to desist. This was tantamount to accepting the democratic
theory of popular sovereignty in its extreme form, and Cicero seems to
have acquiesced. At any rate when Cicero mentioned the incident in the
_Pro Cornelio_ two years later, he raised no objection to the procedure,
and afterwards when he quarreled with Gabinius he did not cast this act
in his teeth.
In the year 66, when Manilius introduced a proposal to place Pompey
in command in Asia, the same coalition of knights and populace again
insulted the senate by taking the bill directly to the assembly. On this
occasion Cicero was the principal speaker for the coalition; and he spoke
as a full-fledged democrat, unashamed. One may of course suppose that
Cicero was largely influenced by life-long connections with the knights
and by a deep devotion to Pompey, apparently dating from the time when he
served under Pompey’s father in the Social War. One also realizes that
the Manilian law had a very great practical appeal, and that a rising and
ambitious young statesman like Cicero would see the advantage of being
chosen as the spokesman for such an important measure of the party then
in power. Be that as it may, the speech of that day is the speech of an
important and accepted member of the popular-equestrian party.[6]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account