Life and literature in the Roman republicFrank, Tenney
History
Life and literature in the Roman republic
Frank, Tenney
Latin literature -- History and criticism; Rome -- Intellectual life
[19] Cic., _De Rep._ iv 10; Livy VII, 2, is full of anachronisms. Cf.
Warnecke, _Neue Jahrb._ 1914, 94. However, Warnecke fails to note how
late the evidence is and how completely it disagrees with the known
circumstances of the early Roman drama. Plautus, _Cist._ 785, which
promises a flogging to the incapable actor, is of course one of the
jokes of the play. The ninth article of the recently discovered charter
of Cyrene excuses from certain public service various people (including
doctors and teachers of music) who are engaged in professions of public
welfare. Since the actors’ guild at Rome was based upon Alexandrian
models, it is not unlikely that certain Ptolemaic regulations were also
taken over.
CHAPTER IV
TERENCE AND HIS SUCCESSORS
Plautus lived in the most productive period of Roman comedy. He happens
to mention only one rival, the aged Naevius, but from later sources we
learn of Caecilius, Licinius, Trabea, Atilius, Titinius, and others who
apparently began to write before the death of Plautus. That all of these
actually staged plays we may be sure, since manuscripts had no chance of
surviving unless they came into the official archives by way of purchase
for production. So numerous were the old manuscripts in these archives
that Plautus, who could at most not have written more than thirty or
forty plays, was later credited with a hundred and thirty. Apparently
unsigned plays were attributed to him because of the commercial value
of his name. But the fact that so many stray plays were in existence is
significant of the activity of writers. It is not surprising therefore
that a guild of “writers and actors” flourished in the days of Plautus,
and that the state recognized it and assigned it quarters on the Aventine.
Of the earlier men from whose works we have fragments, only two are in
any way individualized in the scant remains. Titinius, who seems to have
been a late rival of Plautus, was so thoroughly lost to his successors
that Cicero seems not to have been aware of him. But Varro refers to
Titinius in high terms in his work on the Latin language, written
while he was gathering books for Caesar’s projected public library.
Varro probably was the man who ferreted out his plays and name from the
aediles’ archives. It is signal praise that Varro gives Titinius when
he places him by the side of Terence as a delineator of character. An
allusion to one of his plays by Horace seems to indicate that some of
his work was actually staged in the early Empire (more than a hundred
years after the dramatist’s death) for the poet refers to a scene that is
visualized rather than to a line read, and he assumes that Augustus will
recognize his allusion.[1]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account