Life and literature in the Roman republicFrank, Tenney
History
Life and literature in the Roman republic
Frank, Tenney
Latin literature -- History and criticism; Rome -- Intellectual life
Of a primitive drama we have a vigorous tradition. Simple comic farces
were in existence in the village festivals both north and south of
Rome—and likely enough at Rome too, though the city preferred to forget
its primitive amusements as it grew into a metropolis. Unfortunately the
tradition regarding the early Latin drama was vitiated by some early
quasi-scholar—apparently Accius—who mingled futile hearsay with a line or
two of an early record about Etruscan dancers and with the Aristotelian
theory of how Greek drama grew up.[2] He mis-called this putative drama
by the name _satura_. His story unfortunately became orthodox and
displaced what might otherwise have survived of a truer tradition. The
story is attributed to the year 364 B.C., a time at which no historical
records were kept except for the dates and occasions of official priestly
sacrifices. That is to say, the story is not worth repeating because it
is attributed to a date when no records were kept of such events. All we
know is that towns not far from Rome—and therefore presumably Rome as
well—had simple drama before Livius began to translate Greek plays.
Such were the germs of the lyric, epic, and drama, vital and capable
of growth when and if the times should be favorable. But what is a
favorable time? Why, for instance, had not literature come to life among
others of the countless tribes about the Mediterranean except the Greeks
and Hebrews? I ask, not to answer, but to emphasize the riddle. At Rome
a few individuals were emerging from the group, the group was itself
breaking out of its boundaries, but experiences were still modest. The
citizens were chiefly quiet hard-working farmers who owned and tilled
their plots; there was no seafaring commerce that brought tales of
adventure from foreign lands, no colonizing beyond the seas, no traveling
to foreign parts to bring the Latins a sense of awareness of their own
place in the world. Society, as in any democracy where customs of the
ruling clique are accepted by the rest, was passing through no strenuous
changes, and no religious teacher from beyond the border was entering to
shake tradition.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account