Life and literature in the Roman republicFrank, Tenney
History
Life and literature in the Roman republic
Frank, Tenney
Latin literature -- History and criticism; Rome -- Intellectual life
The togata, however, kept its place better through the voluminous
contributions of Afranius, whose _floruit_ was just before the Gracchan
day. Of his works, praised by such fair judges as Cicero, Horace, and
Quintilian, we have some seventy titles and over six hundred lines. By
mere chance, we hear of a revival of a play of his in Caesar’s day and
of another even in Nero’s time. Rome was now cosmopolitan enough so that
a writer of comedy need not limit his range. In matter and sentiment
Afranius reminded critics of Menander and Terence, yet his fragments show
that, like Plautus, he availed himself of the advantages of very generous
musical accompaniments. The most striking reference to him which has come
down to us is that of Seneca who says that Afranius blended the spirit of
comedy and tragedy in his work. If we may judge from this statement he
may in this respect have been a precursor of Molière. After Afranius came
Atta who has left us a dozen bare titles and little else.
But legitimate comedy was doomed at Rome. On festival days the populace
had to be amused, and the Roman populace was rapidly changing in
character as slavery was pushing out free labor. Even before the Gracchan
reform Scipio the younger could face the crowds of the Forum with the
remark that most of them had come to Rome as slaves. The Gracchans
did not improve the quality of those crowds when they instituted the
corn-doles. The free manumission of slaves was creating a polyglot
proletariat which corn doles now tended to keep in the city, where they
were fed and amused. In response to the desires of such folk, chariot
races were made more exciting and the gladiatorial shows, introduced
from Campania, became more frequent and more gruesome. Needless to say
the well constructed plots of Plautus and Terence could not hold such
audiences in their seats. The aediles and praetors, who wished to keep
the entertainment on as high a level as possible, still persisted in
producing some respectable plays at every festival, but to save their
popularity in view of future elections they were driven to admit an
increasing number of the more trivial plays as well.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account