Life and Matter: A Criticism of Professor Haeckel's "Riddle of the Universe" — John Shaqi
Life and Matter: A Criticism of Professor Haeckel's "Riddle of the Universe"Lodge, Oliver, Sir
Religion
Life and Matter: A Criticism of Professor Haeckel's "Riddle of the Universe"
Lodge, Oliver, Sir
Haeckel, Ernst, 1834-1919. Welträthsel; Life -- Origin; Monism; Philosophy and religion
"Most of our so-called 'psychologists' have little or no
knowledge of these indispensable foundations of
anthropology—anatomy, histology, ontogeny, and physiology....
Hence it is that most of the psychological literature of the day
is so much waste-paper" (p. 34).
"What we call the soul is, in my opinion, a natural phenomenon;
I therefore consider psychology to be a branch of natural
science—a section of physiology. Consequently, I must
emphatically assert from the commencement that we have no
different methods of research for that science than for any of
the others" (p. 32).
In this difficult Science of Psychology he evidently feels himself quite
at home. He assumes easily and gratuitously that there is a material
substance at the root of all mental processes whatever—called by
Clifford 'mind-stuff,' (see, however, Chapter IV. below,)—and he then
proceeds to lay down the law concerning ancient difficulties as
follows:—
"We shall give to this material basis of all psychic activity,
without which it is inconceivable, the provisional name of
'psychoplasm.'
"The psychic processes are subject to the supreme, all-ruling
law of substance; not even in this province is there a single
exception to this highest cosmological law.
"The dogma of 'free-will,' another essential element of the
dualistic psychology, is similarly irreconcilable with the
universal law of substance" (p. 32).
"The freedom of the will is not an object for critical
scientific inquiry at all, for it is a pure dogma, based on an
illusion, and has no real existence" (p. 6).
Nevertheless, he realises that its apparent existence has to be
accounted for somehow, and accordingly he adopts the view that has
several times occurred to thinkers, viz., that the nucleus of all the
faculties enjoyed by a complete organism must be attributed in germ or
nucleus to the cells and even to the atoms out of which the organism is
built up.
His speculation as to the formation of a conscious organism, and to the
real meaning of its apparent sense of right and wrong and its apparent
control over its own acts, runs as follows, the will being reduced to
attraction and repulsion between the atoms:—
"Vogt's pyknotic theory of substance is that minute parts of
the universal substance, the centres of condensation, which
might be called _pyknatoms_, correspond in general to the
ultimate separate atoms of the kinetic theory; they differ,
however, very considerably in that they are credited with
sensation and inclination (or will-movement of the simplest
form), _with souls_, in a certain sense,—in harmony with the
old theory of Empedocles of the 'loves and hatreds of the
elements.'
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account