Life and Matter: A Criticism of Professor Haeckel's "Riddle of the Universe"Lodge, Oliver, Sir
Religion
Life and Matter: A Criticism of Professor Haeckel's "Riddle of the Universe"
Lodge, Oliver, Sir
Haeckel, Ernst, 1834-1919. Welträthsel; Life -- Origin; Monism; Philosophy and religion
1. The notion that because material energy is constant in quantity,
therefore its transformations and transferences—which admittedly
constitute terrestrial activity—are not susceptible
of guidance or directive control.
2. The idea that the specific guiding power which we call "life" is
one of the forms of material energy, so that directly it
relinquishes its connection with matter other equivalent forms
of energy must arise to replace it.
The book is specially intended to act as an antidote to the speculative
and destructive portions of Professor Haeckel's interesting and
widely-read work, but in other respects it may be regarded less as a
hostile attack than as a supplement—an extension of the more scientific
portions of that work into higher and more fruitful regions of inquiry.
OLIVER LODGE.
University of Birmingham,
_October 1905_.
Contents
CHAP. PAGE
I MONISM 1
II "THE LAW OF SUBSTANCE" 14
III THE DEVELOPMENT OF LIFE 41
IV MEMORANDA FOR WOULD-BE MATERIALISTS 60
V RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHY 71
VI MIND AND MATTER 100
VII PROFESSOR HAECKEL'S CONJECTURAL PHILOSOPHY 125
VIII HYPOTHESIS AND ANALOGIES CONCERNING LIFE 136
IX WILL AND GUIDANCE 152
X FURTHER SPECULATION AS TO THE ORIGIN AND NATURE OF LIFE 179
LIFE AND MATTER
CHAPTER I
MONISM
In his recent Presidential Address before the British Association, at
Cambridge, Mr Balfour rather emphasised the existence and even the
desirability of a barrier between Science and Philosophy which recent
advances have tended to minimise though never to obliterate. He
appeared to hint that it is best for scientific men not to attempt to
philosophise, but to restrict themselves to their own domain; though,
on the other hand, he did not appear to wish similarly to limit
philosophers, by recommending that they should keep themselves
unacquainted with scientific facts, and ignorant of the theories which
weld those facts together. Indeed, in his own person he is an example
of the opposite procedure, for he himself frequently takes pleasure in
overlooking the boundary and making a wide survey of the position on
its physical side—a thing which it is surely very desirable for a
philosopher to do.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account